Cluster Analysis of Self-Awareness Levels in Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury and Relationship to Outcome

Fleming, Jennifer; Strong, Jenny; Ashton, Roderick

doi:10.1097/00001199-199810000-00006

Cited by 180 publications

(116 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

101

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Total scores range from 30 to 150, with higher scores indicating greater competency. The scale has been shown to have strong internal consistency for patient rating (Cronbach's α=.91) and relatives' ratings of patients (Cronbach's α=.93) [43]. Test-retest reliability has been reported as high, r=.97 for patients and .92 for relatives [44].…”

Section: Perceived Performance In Daily Tasksmentioning

confidence: 98%

The Relationship between Self-Efficacy and Well-Being in Stroke Survivors

Maujean

Davis²

2013

Int J Phys Med Rehabil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Perceived Performance In Daily Tasksmentioning

confidence: 98%

The Relationship between Self-Efficacy and Well-Being in Stroke Survivors

Maujean

Davis²

2013

Int J Phys Med Rehabil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Hall et al (2001) found it was associated with several other outcome measures and also showed greater sensitivity across subjects than most measures. Internal consistency of the scale has been reported by Fleming et al (1998), with a Cronbach's alpha reported of .91 for patient ratings and .93 for relative ratings.…”

Section: Psychosocial Measuresmentioning

confidence: 98%

Evaluating a theory of stress and adjustment when predicting long-term psychosocial outcome after brain injury

Rutterford

Wood

2006

J. Inter. Neuropsych. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Kendall and Terry (1996) include many psychosocial predictors in their theoretical model that explains individual differences in psychosocial adjustment (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). The model depicts appraisal and coping variables as mediating relationships between situation factors, environmental and personal resources, and multidimensional outcome. The aim of this study was to explore these theoretical relationships at very late stages of recovery from traumatic brain injury. A total of 131 participants who were more than 10 years post-injury (mean 5 15.31 years) completed several psychosocial measures relating to outcome dimensions comprising employment, community integration, life satisfaction, quality of life (QoL), and emotion. There was no evidence that appraisal and coping variables mediated relationships between psychosocial and any of the outcome variables. However, when appraisal and coping variables were combined with psychosocial variables as direct predictors of outcome, every outcome except employment status was reliably predicted, accounting for between 31 and 46% of the variance. Personality significantly influenced all predicted outcomes. Self-efficacy contributed to the prediction of all outcomes except QoL. Data did not support for the theory of stress and adjustment as a framework for explaining the nature of predictive relationships between psychosocial variables and very long-term, multidimensional outcome after brain injury. (JINS, 2006, 12, 359-367.)

show abstract

“…Fleming, Strong, and Ashton ( 1998 ) reported acceptable 1-week test-retest reliability for patients with TBI using intra-class correlations (ICC r = .85). In the same study, internal consistency was strong for both patient ratings (Cronbach's α = .91, n = 55) and relative ratings of patients (Cronbach's α = .93, n = 50).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Metacognitive unawareness correlates with executive function impairment after severe traumatic brain injury

Ciurli

Bivona

Barba

et al. 2010

J Int Neuropsychol Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A neuropsychological battery was used to evaluate attention, memory and executive functions. SA was assessed by the PCRS, which was administered to patients and close family members. Patients were divided into two groups representing those with and without SA. Patients with poor SA had more problems than those with good SA in some components of the executive system, as indicated by the high percentage of perseverative errors and responses they made on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Moreover, a decrease in metacognitive SA correlated significantly with time to follow commands (TFC). This study suggests the importance of integrating an overall assessment of cognitive functions with a specific evaluation of SA to treat self-awareness and executive functions together during the rehabilitation process.

show abstract

Cluster Analysis of Self-Awareness Levels in Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury and Relationship to Outcome

Cited by 180 publications

References 0 publications

The Relationship between Self-Efficacy and Well-Being in Stroke Survivors

The Relationship between Self-Efficacy and Well-Being in Stroke Survivors

Evaluating a theory of stress and adjustment when predicting long-term psychosocial outcome after brain injury

Metacognitive unawareness correlates with executive function impairment after severe traumatic brain injury

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About