Cluster-Based Beaconing Process for VANET

Allouche, Yair; Segal, Michael

doi:10.1016/j.vehcom.2015.03.001

Cited by 25 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We consider a highway scenario as shown in Figure 6 where vehicles are placed on a six-lane highway with three lanes in each direction. We used a realistic mobility model generator built on the simulator SUMO [6] to produce vehicular mobility traces, in which vehicles derive speeds in the range of 15-45 m/s.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An Improved Mobility Aware Clustering Based Mac Protocol for Safety Message Dissemination in Vanet

2017

IJAERD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We compare the results of the proposed ICDC protocol with the DMMAC [6], and D-FPAV [7] since these protocols carry maximum relevance to the proposed work in respect to comparability. We specify 300 m and 500 m transmission range for event-driven messages.…”

Section: Protocols Comparedmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Improved Mobility Aware Clustering Based Mac Protocol for Safety Message Dissemination in Vanet

2017

IJAERD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Other authors focus on simulation development for protocols used in V2V communications systems. References [38], [39] developed a scheme to improve mobility and stability clustering scheme and cluster-based beacon dissemination process. In addition, other works focus on cross-layer protocol for traffic management, calculation of the desired vehicles' speed necessary to cross and distribution of datagathering protocol for the collection of delay tolerant to make the congestion control efficient [40]- [43].…”

Section: ) Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Deep Review and Analysis of Data Exchange in Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications Systems: Coherent Taxonomy, Challenges, Motivations, Recommendations, Substantial Analysis and Future Directions

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Data exchange in Vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communications systems is a field that requires automated solutions, tools and methods and the capability to facilitate early detection and even a prediction. Many studies have focused on V2V system and its classification to improve road safety, reduce traffic congestion and help streamline the vehicle flow on the road. This study aims to review and analyse literature related to data exchange in V2V communications systems. The factors considered to improve the understanding of the field's various contextual aspects were derived from published studies. We systematically searched all articles about the classification and detection of data exchange in vehicles, as well as their evaluation. Three main databases, namely, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and IEEE Xplore from 2008 to 2018, were used. These indices were considered sufficiently extensive to encompass our literature. On the basis of our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 140 articles were selected. Most articles (53/140) are studies conducted in a V2V communication system; a number of papers (51/140) covered the actual attempts to develop V2V communications; and few papers (18/140) comprised framework proposals and architectures. The last portion (18/140) of articles presented review and survey articles. V2V collision avoidance system, which is a field requiring automated solutions, tools and methods, entails the capability to facilitate early detection. Several studies have been performed on the automatic detection of V2V and their subtypes to promote accurate detection. The basic characteristics of this emerging field are identified from the aspects of motivations, open challenges that impede the technology's utility, authors' recommendations and substantial analysis of the previous studies are discussed based on seven aspect (devices, number of scenario, test location, types of sensors, number of vehicle, evaluation techniques used and types of software). A propose research methodology as new direction is provided to solve the gaps identified in the analysis. This methodology consists of four phases; investigation, develop a hardware system, study and analysis, and evaluation phases. However, research areas on V2V communication with the scope of data exchange are varied. This systematic review is expected to open opportunities for researchers and encourage them to work on the identified gaps.

show abstract

“…Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANET) is an emerging technology aimed to provide communication between vehicles (V2V), between vehicles and infrastructure (V2I), between vehicles and persons (V2P), or even vehicle to everything (V2X) [1]. VANETs are considered inheritors of Mobile Adhoc Networks (MANETs), which have benefited from technologies, such as short radio transmission ranges, low bandwidth, self-organization, and self-management [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Evaluation of GPSR and AODV Routing Protocols for High Vehicular Density VANETs

Amaya¹,

Pohl²,

Lüders³

2021

Anais Do XXXIX Simpósio Brasileiro De Telecomunicações E Processamento De Sinais

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The vehicular Ad-hoc network (VANETs) is a challenging scenario for routing protocols. The high mobility of nodes is responsible for fast changes of topology and frequent interruptions of links. To cope with this challenge, Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing (GPSR) and Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) routing protocols have been devised and widely employed in VANETs. However, most approaches have not properly studied the impact of transmission rates and the effect of time intervals of beacons (Hello messages) in the performance of these protocols. In order to address this impact, this work presents an evaluation of GPSR and AODV protocols in an urban scenario of high vehicular density regarding transmission rates and Hello messages intervals. Results show better performance of GPSR for high transmission rate and high traffic density when compared with AODV. Likewise, GPSR achieves more benefits and fewer impacts from Hello messages than AODV.

show abstract

Cluster-Based Beaconing Process for VANET

Cited by 25 publications

References 25 publications

An Improved Mobility Aware Clustering Based Mac Protocol for Safety Message Dissemination in Vanet

An Improved Mobility Aware Clustering Based Mac Protocol for Safety Message Dissemination in Vanet

A Deep Review and Analysis of Data Exchange in Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communications Systems: Coherent Taxonomy, Challenges, Motivations, Recommendations, Substantial Analysis and Future Directions

Performance Evaluation of GPSR and AODV Routing Protocols for High Vehicular Density VANETs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About