1991
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.43.2425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster cascading in the geometrical branching model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fig The results are shown by the solid lines in Fig. 5, for which (4.9) has been used for h and y , since they were 3. Energy dependence of normalized moments C,.…”
Section: Results Of Eccomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Fig The results are shown by the solid lines in Fig. 5, for which (4.9) has been used for h and y , since they were 3. Energy dependence of normalized moments C,.…”
Section: Results Of Eccomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to implement the branching process with actual steps of branching, a simple Monte Carlo simulation was attempted with the aim of reproducing the global features such as P, in the full rapidity space [3]. Cluster cascading was considered in a scheme in which a specific mass spectrum was used.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of the Gbmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the effect of the discrete charge distribution of adsorbed atoms in some systems (especially the CslIr system) on the work function is remarkable because of the stronger attracting power of Ir atoms for electrons in adsorbed Cs atoms. Thus the calculated results for the work function-coverage curve for the CslIr(OO1) system with the jelliundslab model [61 are not very satisfactory whether by the multiple-energy-parameter augmented-function method [6-8] or by the multiple-energy-parameter function with derivative method [9] for description of wave functions in the jellium-vacuum region in the LMW method (linear augmented plane wave). In Lang's jelliudjellium model [ 1,2], the discretenesses of both substrate and overlayer are neglected simultaneously, so the result is in this case consistent with the realistic case because the positive discrete charges in both regions have an opposite and nearly cancelling effect on the electrons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to consider the effect of discreteness, but not to expand the calculation cell, the jellium spherehlab model [13,14] is used in this paper to simulate the discreteness of positive charge in the overlayer. By the multiple-energy-parameter function with the derivative method proposed in [9], the work function of the Csfir system is calculated and an improved work functioncoverage curve is obtained. The charge transition between the jellium-vacuum region and slab as well as the potential in the jellium-vacuum region are analysed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%