2022
DOI: 10.1029/2022gl097947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster‐Enhanced Ensemble Learning for Mapping Global Monthly Surface Ozone From 2003 to 2019

Abstract: Surface ozone is damaging to human health and crop yields. When evaluating global air pollution risk, gridded datasets with high accuracy are desired to reflect the local variations in air pollution concentrations. Here, a cluster‐enhanced ensemble machine learning method was used to develop a new 0.5‐degree monthly surface ozone data set during 2003–2019 by combining numerous informative variables. The overall accuracy of our data set is 91.5% (90.8% for space and 92.3% for time). Historically, populations in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Liu et al. (2022) methods to obtain O 3 estimates can be divided into regional and global chemical transport models, statistical models, geostatistical data fusion, and machine learning models. While dynamical climate chemistry models are a useful tool to assess future O 3 , they come with the drawback of being computationally expensive and thus the number of model runs is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to Liu et al. (2022) methods to obtain O 3 estimates can be divided into regional and global chemical transport models, statistical models, geostatistical data fusion, and machine learning models. While dynamical climate chemistry models are a useful tool to assess future O 3 , they come with the drawback of being computationally expensive and thus the number of model runs is limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While dynamical climate chemistry models are a useful tool to assess future O 3 , they come with the drawback of being computationally expensive and thus the number of model runs is limited. Machine learning models have a very good performance, but they are generally characterized by low interpretability (Liu et al., 2022). Statistical models, which are very flexible, computationally inexpensive, and easy to interpret, have so far used meteorological information to assess future O 3 concentrations, neglecting information about the precursor emissions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We obtained O 3 data from a global dataset of monthly surface O 3 concentrations with a more complete spatiotemporal coverage ( 30 ); this O 3 dataset was constructed by applying ensemble machine learning techniques to satellite observations, chemical transport model outputs, atmospheric reanalysis and emission data, and ground-surface observations. The monthly mean daily maximum 8-hour average (MDA8) O 3 concentrations during 2003–2019 were calculated across a regular 0.5° × 0.5° (≈50 km × 50 km) grid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%