2016
DOI: 10.1111/head.12874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster headache and other TACs: Pathophysiology and neurostimulation options

Abstract: DBS has good results, but it is a more invasive technique and can generate serious adverse events. ONS has good results, but frequent and not serious adverse events. SPG stimulation (SPGS) is also efficacious in the acute and prophylactic treatment of refractory cluster headache. At this moment, ONS and SPG stimulation techniques are recommended as first line therapy in refractory cluster patients. New recent non-invasive approaches such as the non-invasive vagal nerve stimulator (nVNS) have shown efficacy in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another single-center, long-term follow-up (1-8-year) study revealed that 8 out of 16 drugresistant CCH patients became asymptomatic with bilateral ONS, whereas 2 patients changed from the chronic to episodic subtype, and 4 out of 16 patients showed more than 50% improvement in the reduction of the number of headache attacks. The frequent AEs were electrode migration, battery replacement, and local infection [119].…”
Section: Single-center Studies Of Implantable Ons In Chmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another single-center, long-term follow-up (1-8-year) study revealed that 8 out of 16 drugresistant CCH patients became asymptomatic with bilateral ONS, whereas 2 patients changed from the chronic to episodic subtype, and 4 out of 16 patients showed more than 50% improvement in the reduction of the number of headache attacks. The frequent AEs were electrode migration, battery replacement, and local infection [119].…”
Section: Single-center Studies Of Implantable Ons In Chmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuromodulatory treatment options, both invasive (brain stimulation, implantable nerve stimulators) and noninvasive (transcutaneous stimulators) have become available as an option to treat CH. 12 Deep brain stimulation for highly selected patients has been shown to be effective, but carries potentially serious risks. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration approved a hand-held vagal nerve stimulator to treat acute attacks of CH in those with episodic CH.…”
Section: Clinical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was initially developed for and applied to movement disorders in several target areas; such as the thalamus, the pallidum, and the subthalamic nucleus. It is currently being extended to other indications, such as epilepsy (Chan et al 2018;Hartl et al 2018;Lobato-Polo et al 2018;Son et al 2018), dystonia (Magown et al 2018;Takeda et al 2018), tremor (Moldovan et al 2017;Camalier et al 2018), cluster headache (Chabardès et al 2016;Láinez and Guillamón 2017), chronic pain, including pain from stroke (Lempka et al 2017;Gopalakrishnan et al 2018), amputation (Pereira et al 2013;Kuffler 2018), trigeminal neuralgia (Nizard et al 2012;Yamgoue et al 2016) and multiple sclerosis (Abboud et al 2017;Oliveria et al 2017), and recently to psychiatric disorders, such as obsessive compulsive disorder (Naesström et al 2017;Winter et al 2017;Franzini et al 2018), Tourette's syndrome (Marceglia et al 2017;Martinez-Ramirez et al 2018), and depression (Kringelbach et al 2007b). The mechanism of action will likely turn out to be quite complex, involving cell-firing inhibition, neurotransmitter depletion, jamming and excitation of inhibitory pathways that lead to functional inhibition, and mimicking the effects of lesioning of the stimulated structures (Benabid 2014).…”
Section: Invasive Brain Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%