2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.01.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster-level trust prediction based on multi-modal social networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, supervised learning must have labeled data to train the model, in most ZTA practical application scenarios, users and devices features lack clear labels, and unsupervised learning such as K-means [90,162,96,154] can solve this problem by clustering trust objects without label into different level of trust groups. To further improve unsupervised learning performance, semi-supervised learning, which combines supervised and unsupervised learning, can be used to optimize the clustering boundaries.…”
Section: Experience-driven Trust Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, supervised learning must have labeled data to train the model, in most ZTA practical application scenarios, users and devices features lack clear labels, and unsupervised learning such as K-means [90,162,96,154] can solve this problem by clustering trust objects without label into different level of trust groups. To further improve unsupervised learning performance, semi-supervised learning, which combines supervised and unsupervised learning, can be used to optimize the clustering boundaries.…”
Section: Experience-driven Trust Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be utilized to process data for trust evaluation. For example, in the absence of trust attribute information, machine learning is used to cluster similar users according to user attributes, and then for those users lacking trust information, trust evaluation is performed with the trust data of the user that does not lack trust information [Zhang et al 2016].…”
Section: Machine Learning Algorithms For Assisting Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no discussion on computational overhead. Zhang et al [2016] offered a method of trust prediction on the basis of co-cluster to mitigate the sparseness of an explicit trust graph and improve its ability to predict trust. They graphically represented social networks with users and items and utilized the users' rating on items and the relationship between the users to predict trust.…”
Section: :13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are defined based on the researchers experience and require an intensive manual engineering. Moreover, these approaches usually require a time consuming preprocessing phase such as computation of global trust [20], execution of a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) [21] or finding all the paths between two nodes to calculate their similarity [22]. These calculations might be feasible for a small network graph, but not for a large graph dataset [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%