2014
DOI: 10.1186/2050-7283-2-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster-randomised controlled trial of an occupational therapy group intervention for children designed to promote emotional wellbeing: study protocol

Abstract: BackgroundSymptoms of anxiety and depression are common in childhood, as are risk factors that undermine wellbeing: low self-esteem and limited participation in daily occupations. Current treatments focus primarily on modifying internal cognitions with insufficient effect on functional outcomes. Occupational therapists have a role in measuring and enabling children’s functional abilities to promote health and wellbeing. To-date there is no evidence for the use of occupational therapy as an intervention to prom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four protocol reports were reviewed, of which three identified as cluster RCTs in the title. Three protocols provided ICCs (range = 0.01-0.05), and one provided a design effect ( Tokolahi, Hocking, Kersten, & Vandal, 2014 ). As these were protocols, there were no data to report when describing baseline comparisons; all four described inclusion and exclusion criteria for the clusters; however, prior to recruitment and randomization, comparison between the study arms was not feasible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four protocol reports were reviewed, of which three identified as cluster RCTs in the title. Three protocols provided ICCs (range = 0.01-0.05), and one provided a design effect ( Tokolahi, Hocking, Kersten, & Vandal, 2014 ). As these were protocols, there were no data to report when describing baseline comparisons; all four described inclusion and exclusion criteria for the clusters; however, prior to recruitment and randomization, comparison between the study arms was not feasible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cluster‐RCT reported here was an ethically sound, well‐designed study with a fully pre‐specified statistical analysis plan (Tokolahi et al., ). Features of the study design that minimised the risk of biases included randomisation at the cluster level, allocation concealment, blinding of participants until after the collection of baseline measures, blinding of outcome assessors, and the use of a control group for comparison during the parallel phase (see Appendix for where each item on the CONSORT statement has been reported).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children were excluded if they reported para/suicidal thoughts or behaviours or they were involved with a secondary mental health service. Further details are available in Tokolahi, Hocking, Kersten, and Vandal (2014). This trial was pragmatic as it measured the effectiveness of an intervention in real-world context (i.e.…”
Section: Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses engagement in developmentally appropriate activities to promote mental health and well-being by enabling students to understand the relationship between what they do and how this influences their identity, self-concept, health and wellbeing; to practice and develop strategies for overcoming difficult emotions; and to apply this knowledge in designing and building healthy routines, behaviors and habits in their day-to-day life. This intervention is currently being evaluated in a cluster randomized controlled trial (Tokolahi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, if the cluster randomized controlled trial (in progress (Tokolahi et al, 2014)) demonstrates sufficient effectiveness of this intervention for promoting wellbeing in children, there is scope for introducing it into the health promotion component of schools' curricula. The process described in this paper could be used by other practitioners when developing interventions or seeking to define current interventions more accurately to facilitate more robust evaluation of clinical practice.…”
Section: Practice Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%