2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.84.054614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster transfer in the reaction16O+208Pb at energies well below the fusion barrier: A possible doorway to energy diss

Abstract: The reaction 16 O + 208 Pb is a benchmark in nuclear reaction studies as it involves two doubly magic nuclei. New measurements of back-scattered projectile-like fragments at sub-barrier energies show that the probability of two-proton (2p) transfer is much larger than that of α-particle transfer. At energies around the fusion barrier the probability for 2p transfer is ∼10%, similar to that for one-proton transfer. The 2p transfer probabilities are enhanced by up to an order of magnitude compared to calculation… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(115 reference statements)
5
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here contributions from correlated 2p transfer and alpha transfer are both evident, though with probabilities lower than the observed 1p transfer, and with the 2p channel dominant over the ΔZ = 2 channel. 16 O has traditionally been thought to be a good candidate for alpha clustering structures, being a light N = Z nucleus, though this result, as well as those reported in [15], contradict this picture. However, as seen in figure 11, at the largest internuclear separations the 2p and α transfer channels appear to become almost equivalent.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here contributions from correlated 2p transfer and alpha transfer are both evident, though with probabilities lower than the observed 1p transfer, and with the 2p channel dominant over the ΔZ = 2 channel. 16 O has traditionally been thought to be a good candidate for alpha clustering structures, being a light N = Z nucleus, though this result, as well as those reported in [15], contradict this picture. However, as seen in figure 11, at the largest internuclear separations the 2p and α transfer channels appear to become almost equivalent.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The physical origin of this phenomenon has been extensively sought [11][12][13], but no convincing explanation capable of consistently describing fusion above and below the Coulomb barrier has been forthcoming. Several theoretical explanations have been put forward-Amongst other mechanisms, energy dissipation [14,15] and transfer processes [16] in heavy ion collisions have been suggested to play a part in the observed suppression of fusion cross sections in many systems below the Coulomb barrier. The inclusion of dissipative couplings in fusion models has been shown to potentially account for the hindrance effect [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, transfer could favour neck formation and, thus, diffusion towards a compound nucleus. It has also been argued that transfer could be a doorway to dissipation hindering fusion [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nucleon transfer channels have also been shown to affect the fusion process [15][16][17][18][19]. However, a deep understanding of the interplay between fusion and transfer is still needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fusion cross sections evaluated by using the full (the sum of macroscopic and shell-correction energy parts) nucleus-nucleus potential are compared with the experimental data for reaction 16 O+ 208 Pb [28] in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Fusion Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%