2005
DOI: 10.1198/106186005x59243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster Validation by Prediction Strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
505
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 519 publications
(509 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
505
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sequence of predominating topographies (template maps) in the cumulative group-averaged data was identified using a hierarchical clustering based on an atomize and agglomerate approach. The optimal number of clusters to describe the dataset was identified using a modified KrzanowskieLai criterion (Tibshirani et al, 2005). Differences in the pattern of topographic maps observed between conditions in the group-averaged data were tested by calculating the spatial correlation between these template maps from the group-averaged data and each time-point of single-subject data from each experimental condition.…”
Section: Topographic Patterns Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequence of predominating topographies (template maps) in the cumulative group-averaged data was identified using a hierarchical clustering based on an atomize and agglomerate approach. The optimal number of clusters to describe the dataset was identified using a modified KrzanowskieLai criterion (Tibshirani et al, 2005). Differences in the pattern of topographic maps observed between conditions in the group-averaged data were tested by calculating the spatial correlation between these template maps from the group-averaged data and each time-point of single-subject data from each experimental condition.…”
Section: Topographic Patterns Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…unige.ch/cartool.htm; see also Tibshirani et al, 2005). This clustering procedure identifies the topographies (ie maps) dominating the group-averaged AEPs across populations/ conditions.…”
Section: Eeg Recordings and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are Ben-Hur et al (2002), Bryan (2004), Dudoit and Fridlyand (2002), Grün and Leisch (2004), Lange et al (2004), Monti et al (2001) and Tibshirani and Walther (2005). Many of these papers use stability or prediction strength measurements as a tool to estimate the true number of clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%