2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cluster validity index for irregular clustering results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, for comparison with existing methods, we performed principal component analysis (PCA) and feature extraction (amplitude and number of peaks) followed by k -means and hierarchical clustering using MATLAB. 19,31 The comparison of various clustering methods was performed using seven different validation techniques as presented in Liang et al 39…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, for comparison with existing methods, we performed principal component analysis (PCA) and feature extraction (amplitude and number of peaks) followed by k -means and hierarchical clustering using MATLAB. 19,31 The comparison of various clustering methods was performed using seven different validation techniques as presented in Liang et al 39…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It measures how compact the cluster is formed based on the ratio of the minimum distance between objects that are not in the same cluster using the maximum intra-cluster distance [21]. The compact clusters have a Di value close to one.…”
Section:  Dunn Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some validity indexes [11,12,13,14] worked with hierarchical clustering algorithm, and got good results. According to arbitrary shaped mass data set, literature [15,16,17] presented separation method to improve performance of validity index which partitioned the original data space into a grid-based structure that allowed the introduction of a new measurement for assessing the true data distribution between any two clusters instead of the distance between the two cluster prototypes. This method measures spherical data set and irregular data set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%