1981
DOI: 10.2307/3151350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
719
0
17

Year Published

1994
1994
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 718 publications
(739 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
719
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Then the compounds were clustered according to their 2D structural features by the leader algorithm [33] as implemented in DAIM [24] and using a Tanimoto coefficient of 0.995 as similarity threshold (note that a high threshold value was used to weed out only the compounds that were very similar to each other as the docking approach employed in this study is very efficient). The compound with the highest similarity to all other molecules in the same cluster was used for docking into the binding site.…”
Section: Preparation Of the Library Of Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the compounds were clustered according to their 2D structural features by the leader algorithm [33] as implemented in DAIM [24] and using a Tanimoto coefficient of 0.995 as similarity threshold (note that a high threshold value was used to weed out only the compounds that were very similar to each other as the docking approach employed in this study is very efficient). The compound with the highest similarity to all other molecules in the same cluster was used for docking into the binding site.…”
Section: Preparation Of the Library Of Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was an 83.13% agreement of case classification between the two clustering algorithms. Finally, to further evaluate the three-cluster solution K-Means cluster analysis (Hartigan, 1975) was used. Using SIAS scores and appraisal ratings as initial cluster centers, a three-cluster solution was specified and supported.…”
Section: Nih-pa Author Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final objective of the analysis is to obtain clusters as distinct as possible by minimizing variability in platelet aggregation response within clusters and to maximize variability between clusters. 26 Therefore, we compared demographic and metabolic characteristics of the three clusters by analysis of variance one-way with Scheffè post hoc test, or cross-tabulation with Pearson's w 2 . Then, a discriminant analysis of age, gender and metabolic profiles of clusters was performed.…”
Section: Analytic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%