2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2008.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering analysis of the seismic catalog of Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that non-uniform status of seismic monitoring in an area introduce factors of inconsistency and incompleteness in any earthquake catalog, resulting into inherent uncertainty in the search for 'long-term earthquake clustering' (Kagan and Jackson, 1991). Further, any statistical treatment for cluster analysis essentially depends on the completeness of the earthquake catalogue (Ansari et al 2009). For this purpose, suitable magnitude for catalogue completeness has been carried out as per the GutenbergRichter relationship.…”
Section: Seismic Cluster Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is known that non-uniform status of seismic monitoring in an area introduce factors of inconsistency and incompleteness in any earthquake catalog, resulting into inherent uncertainty in the search for 'long-term earthquake clustering' (Kagan and Jackson, 1991). Further, any statistical treatment for cluster analysis essentially depends on the completeness of the earthquake catalogue (Ansari et al 2009). For this purpose, suitable magnitude for catalogue completeness has been carried out as per the GutenbergRichter relationship.…”
Section: Seismic Cluster Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…SOM is another widely used seismic cluster method, and Zamani and Hashemi [5] introduced a self-organized tectonic zoning for Iran, and then Zamani et al [18] chose Wilk's Lambda criterion and a relative discrepancy of Wilk's Lambda to determine the optimum tectonic zoning number; and Mojarab et al [19] discussed the effect of SOM input parameters. Fuzzy clusters have also been used in seismic clusters, Ansari et al [4] and Benitez et al [21] used the Gath and Giva (GG) fuzzy cluster for Iran and South West Colombia, respectively; while Monem and Hashemy [20] applied the fuzzy -means (FCM) and the GustafsonKessel (GK) clusters to the Ghazvin canal irrigation network. In addition, the density-based algorithms [22][23][24] and the TriGen-based method [25] have also been applied for the seismic cluster.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microseismic monitoring has been widely used in mining [1][2][3], where seismicity partitioning is an important step in geological structure interpretation and seismic hazard assessment [4]. Although this task can be implemented by an expert visually, the expert knowledge-based cluster is nonquantitative, subjective, and hard to interpret for a large amount of data [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This subsection is concluded with a mention to the following studies dealing with the unsupervised classification problem: (Ansari et al, 2009;Esposito et al, 2007;2005;Orozco-Alzate & Castellanos-Domínguez, 2007). They are aimed at finding clusters in seismic volcanic data and understanding their structure.…”
Section: Publicationmentioning
confidence: 99%