2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering and firm productivity spillovers in Indonesian manufacturing

Abstract: Earlier studies on foreign direct investment (FDI) and firm productivity have mainly focused on the general impacts of FDI on local firms' productivity. This current research extends the existing literature by examining the heterogeneity issue in firm productivity by clustering Indonesian manufacturing firms into nine industrial groups. Two estimation methods are applied: stochastic frontier analysis and panel data analysis, which emerge three key findings. Firstly, the impacts of FDI vary among firm clusters,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were robust across all empirical observations. This finding is consistent with theories arguing that knowledge transfer occurs more easily between firms in the same geographical location than between those in distant regions (Suyanto et al, 2021). Cainelli (2008) discovered that manufacturing firms significantly influence economic performance when they are part of an industrial zone, where they exhibit higher productivity than those located outside industrial districts.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results were robust across all empirical observations. This finding is consistent with theories arguing that knowledge transfer occurs more easily between firms in the same geographical location than between those in distant regions (Suyanto et al, 2021). Cainelli (2008) discovered that manufacturing firms significantly influence economic performance when they are part of an industrial zone, where they exhibit higher productivity than those located outside industrial districts.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although theoretical literature indicates a potential positive correlation between firm size and productivity, the empirical studies find mixed evidence. Most researchers discover a positive effect of firm size on productivity through capital accumulation [23,24], technology advancement [2,3], skilled workers [4,5], and foreign ownership [7,25]. Several researchers unveil a negative impact of firm size and argue that small and medium enterprises are more productive due to their adaptability in dealing with economic downturn [5], affectivity in learning new knowledge [9], and flexibility in management decisions [8].…”
Section: Firm Size and Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constructed panel data consists of 6,783 firms for 7 years from 2007 to 2013, so the total observations are 47,481. The procedure to construct a balanced panel follows [7]. This balanced panel data is used for estimations under the two models (AA-OLS and RE-GLS).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study uses the one-stage stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) introduced by Battese & Coelli (1995) to avoid the inconsistency effect found in the two-stage estimation approach (Habiyaremye, 2019;Suyanto et al, 2021a). The one-stage SFA simultaneously estimates the production frontier and inefficiency equation to measure the technical inefficiency scores and variables affecting the inefficiency scores.…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%