Clustering and psychological barriers: the importance of numbers

Abstract

The contemporary press frequently makes mention of, and identifies significance with, specific numerical values in financial markets. This focus has been suggested to result in clustering. Furthermore, these symbolic numbers are often referred to as psychological barriers. These effects are identified as a widespread phenomenon permeating into the economic decision making and financial market environments. This article outlines various arguments and rationale from the cultural, economic, and behavioral literature why clustering and other effects such as psychological barriers may be expected in financial markets. Evidence across a variety of literatures suggests that financial market clustering derives from a variety of sources. There is evidence from a cultural and conventional basis to suggest that number preference exists and that there is a natural tendency to round that derives from the development of the modern decimal system. The literature also provides valid behavioral and economic reasons as to why these effects may occur. However, no evidence is found to support the notion that clustering or barriers in financial markets would occur as a result of a natural order or as a product of the number progression or simply from the numbers themselves. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 21:395–428, 2001

Do Industrial Incidents in the Chemical Sector Create Equity Market Contagion?

“…Inspired by the psychology literature, 10 and 100 were used as the cut-off fatality rates. Mitchell (2001) claims that the use of a decimal system suggests a natural tendency for people to think in terms of 10s and powers of 10, therefore grouping by the powers of 10 facilitates the mental ordering of the events and provides computationally convenient breaks between groups. Apart from reporting the actual numbers of deaths following an incident, the news media will often describe the seriousness of the event in terms of the number of digits of the injury and death toll.…”

Understanding Irrigator Bidding Behavior in Australian Water Markets in Response to Uncertainty

“…An alternative explanation for clustering is that its existence is the result of strategic behavior-where people estimate the net benefits of their action [30]. Specifically, they weigh the benefits of increasing the precision of their bid/offer relative to the loss of value resulting from an imprecise estimate.…”

Clustering in the futures market: Evidence from S&P 500 futures contracts

“…Investors who are aware of clustering tendencies may be able to trade at slightly better prices and may be able to place limit orders higher in time/price priority by avoiding the clustering points (see Jennings, 2001;and Edwards & Harris, 2002). Further, Mitchell (2001), states that clustering of prices indicates that traders may believe there is some relevant information in a particular pricing grid or possibly some particular pricing barriers.…”