2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/916240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering Molecular Dynamics Trajectories for Optimizing Docking Experiments

Abstract: Molecular dynamics simulations of protein receptors have become an attractive tool for rational drug discovery. However, the high computational cost of employing molecular dynamics trajectories in virtual screening of large repositories threats the feasibility of this task. Computational intelligence techniques have been applied in this context, with the ultimate goal of reducing the overall computational cost so the task can become feasible. Particularly, clustering algorithms have been widely used as a means… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used similar ideas as the approach taken in Ref. (66), focusing on the binding site’s structural fluctuations rather than the entire structure. All six clustering methods (TICA, PCA, and Gromos for backbone or C-alpha atoms and CBA) were also performed on the holo MD trajectories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used similar ideas as the approach taken in Ref. (66), focusing on the binding site’s structural fluctuations rather than the entire structure. All six clustering methods (TICA, PCA, and Gromos for backbone or C-alpha atoms and CBA) were also performed on the holo MD trajectories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, if a receptor conformation belongs to a cluster that interacts favorably with a specific ligand, we can assume that other conformations within the same cluster have similar structural properties in their substrate-binding cavity, and consequently, will behave similarly. Otherwise, if the interaction between the same receptor and ligand is unfavorable, we can consider that this cluster has unpromising snapshots and can be discarded to reduce the number of docking experiments on the FFR model [ 42 ]. Due to this high level of binding cavity similarity within a cluster, we used the optimal clustering solution selected by De Paris et al [ 20 ] as input to the method proposed in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each ligand, with its structures colored by atom type, is identified by their name and its corresponding PDB ID. The dashed circle represents the rotatable bounds selected by AutoDockTools 1.5.6 [31].…”
Section: E Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%