Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a significant risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke [1]. T2DM removes the normal sex related differences in the prevalence of CHD. Asian Indian women are comparatively worse off than men with regard to many of the risk factors for CHD [2]. Hence the present cross-sectional study was aimed to compare Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS) and Framingham Risk Score (FRS) by obesity and lipid abnormality status in women of Asian Indian origin. The study was conducted from and body composition measures, blood pressure measures, metabolic profiles were all collected using standard techniques [2,3]. Participants were considered as underweight when they had body mass index (BMI) <18.5 kg/m 2 , normal with BMI≥18.5 to <23.0 kg/m 2 and overweight when they had BMI≥23 kg/m 2 . Cut off values of central obesity measure and IDRS are given elsewhere [4]. Similarly, FRS of <9 and ≥9 was also used to dichotomize the study population. Atherogenic index (AI) was calculated using the following equation: (Total Cholesterol-High density lipoprotein cholesterol)/ High density lipoprotein cholesterol. The atherogenic index of <3.42 and ≥3.42 (3.42 was equivalent to 85th percentile of AI in the study participants) was used to identify the subjects who were at risk of lipids abnormality.The mean and standard deviation (SD) of age, BMI, waist circumference (WC), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 38.52 . Comparison of IDRS and FRS by obesity (both generalized and central obesity) status revealed that there was significant difference ½# 2 ð2Þ ¼ 23:61 between medium and high risk of IDRS for both generalized (as measured by BMI categories) and central obesity (as measured by WC categories) status. No individual was eventually found in the low IDRS category. Moreover, interestingly, no significant group difference was observed for FRS by obesity (both generalized and central obesity) status. Unlike FRS, a significant group difference ½# 2 ð1Þ ¼ 4:37 for IDRS was also evident by atherogenic index.Unlike FRS, significant group differences (medium vs. high risk category) for IDRS by obesity status and atherogenic index hinted that IDRS can predict cardiovascular and diabetic risk more effectively than FRS in the people of Asian Indian origin. It is noteworthy to mention that in a case-control retrospective study [5], it was also argued that in the Indian population, the Framingham risk prediction protocol fails to identify a large proportion of high risk non-diabetic patients. The simple and cost effective IDRS could thus serve as a tool for a primary care physician or a health worker to identify at risk individuals for diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. However, a more comprehensive risk prediction protocol for Indian population is urgently required to identify at risk individuals in the coming years.