2001
DOI: 10.1006/taap.2001.9243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering of Hepatotoxins Based on Mechanism of Toxicity Using Gene Expression Profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
158
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 361 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
158
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the repressed genes classified into this process were only SMUG1 in the TCE treatment and RAD23B in the DMN and TCE treatments. Furthermore, CDKN1A (p21/Waf1), which has been reported to be associated with cell cycle arrest following DNA damage [Waring et al, 2001;Lee et al, 2006], was upregulated with 3.5-and 2.5-folds in the DMN and TPA treatments, respectively.…”
Section: Genes Altered By Model Chemical Exposuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the repressed genes classified into this process were only SMUG1 in the TCE treatment and RAD23B in the DMN and TCE treatments. Furthermore, CDKN1A (p21/Waf1), which has been reported to be associated with cell cycle arrest following DNA damage [Waring et al, 2001;Lee et al, 2006], was upregulated with 3.5-and 2.5-folds in the DMN and TPA treatments, respectively.…”
Section: Genes Altered By Model Chemical Exposuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In medicine, initial studies proved that classification of cancer types was possible based on their gene expression profile (2), leading to the development of microarray based tests that are now used clinically to predict cancer prognosis (3). Toxicological studies have also shown the ability to classify chemicals and predict their mode of toxicity on the basis of their gene expression profiles (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M essenger RNA samples are often pooled in a microarray experiment out of necessity (1,2) or in an effort to reduce the effects of biological variation (3)(4)(5)(6). The idea behind the latter motivation is that differences due to subject-to-subject variation will be minimized, making substantive features easier to find (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%