2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering of local extrema in Planck CMB maps

Abstract: The clustering of local extrema will be exploited to examine Gaussianity, asymmetry, and the footprint of the cosmic-string network on the CMB observed by Planck. The number density of local extrema (npk for peak and ntr for trough) and sharp clipping (npix) statistics support the Gaussianity hypothesis for all component separations. However, the pixel at the threshold reveals a more consistent treatment with respect to end-to-end simulations. A very tiny deviation from associated simulations in the context of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…About selecting a typical integrand among various options as mentioned in the Appendix, we must point out that as our starting point is motivated from the application point of view, we adopt the following properties to propose the functional form of the integrand in Equation (18): directional dependency which is encoded in the first derivative of the underlying field and also inspired by the definition of crossing statistics (Ryden 1988); intuitively, our suggestion belongs to the moment and cumulant definition of density field which is more reasonable compared to other complicated functions; taking other typical functions into account, namely, f (|∇δ ( r, s) | n , ∇ 2 δ ( r, s) , ∇ i ∇ j δ ( r, s) ∇ i ∇ j δ ( r, s) ,...) is in principle allowed but it turns out that the higher derivative the higher computational time consuming and even opens new room for the higher value of numerical uncertainty. Generally, the shear tensor ij and characteristic radius of local extrema (R * ∼ σ 1 /σ 2 ), are relevant when we are dealing with the local extrema (Bardeen et al 1986;Vafaei Sadr & Movahed 2021). As long as our purpose is focusing on directional dependency, we do not need to examine the extrema condition expressed by the second derivatives; consequently, a reasonable choice is adopting the first derivative of the density field.…”
Section: The Cmd Statistical Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…About selecting a typical integrand among various options as mentioned in the Appendix, we must point out that as our starting point is motivated from the application point of view, we adopt the following properties to propose the functional form of the integrand in Equation (18): directional dependency which is encoded in the first derivative of the underlying field and also inspired by the definition of crossing statistics (Ryden 1988); intuitively, our suggestion belongs to the moment and cumulant definition of density field which is more reasonable compared to other complicated functions; taking other typical functions into account, namely, f (|∇δ ( r, s) | n , ∇ 2 δ ( r, s) , ∇ i ∇ j δ ( r, s) ∇ i ∇ j δ ( r, s) ,...) is in principle allowed but it turns out that the higher derivative the higher computational time consuming and even opens new room for the higher value of numerical uncertainty. Generally, the shear tensor ij and characteristic radius of local extrema (R * ∼ σ 1 /σ 2 ), are relevant when we are dealing with the local extrema (Bardeen et al 1986;Vafaei Sadr & Movahed 2021). As long as our purpose is focusing on directional dependency, we do not need to examine the extrema condition expressed by the second derivatives; consequently, a reasonable choice is adopting the first derivative of the density field.…”
Section: The Cmd Statistical Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The central assumptions in many cosmological studies are homogeneity, isotropy, and Gaussianity due to the extension of the central limit theorem domain (see also Kumar Aluri et al 2023 for a comprehensive explanation of the cosmological principle). In the real data sets, not only the violation of Gaussianity is expected, but also the anisotropy can emerge due to different reasons ranging from initial conditions and phase transitions to the nonlinearity among the evolution (Bernardeau et al 2002;Springel et al 2006;Hou et al 2009;Planck Collaboration et al 2014a, 2014bRenaux-Petel 2015;Planck Collaboration et al 2016a, 2016bVafaei Sadr & Movahed 2021). Subsequently, to explore the large-scale structures in the redshift space as the counterpart of the real space, many powerful statistical measures have been considered by concentrating on the non-Gaussianity and anisotropy (Matsubara 1996;Codis et al 2013;Appleby et al 2018Appleby et al , 2019Appleby et al , 2023.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [49], it is also mentioned that the polarization pattern of cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation measurements can be represented by 2 × 2 positive definite matrices, see the primer by Hu and White [30]. In a very recent and interesting paper, Vafaei Sadr and Movahed [56] presented evidence for the Gaussianity of the local extrema of CMB maps. We can also mention [22], where finite mixtures of skewed SMN distributions were applied to an image recognition problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [10], it is also mentioned that the polarization pattern of cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation measurements can be represented by 2 × 2 positive definite matrices; see the primer by Hu and White [12]. In a very recent and interesting paper, Vafaei Sadr and Movahed [13] presented evidence for the Gaussianity of the local extrema of CMB maps. We can also mention [14], where finite mixtures of skewed MN distributions were applied to an image recognition problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%