2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/149/6/179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering of Local Group Distances: Publication Bias or Correlated Measurements? Iii. The Small Magellanic Cloud

Abstract: Aiming at providing a firm mean distance estimate to the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), and thus to place it within the internally consistent Local Group distance framework we recently established, we compiled the current-largest database of published distance estimates to the galaxy. Based on careful statistical analysis, we derive mean distance estimates to the SMC using eclipsing binary systems, variable stars, stellar population tracers, and star cluster properties. Their weighted mean leads to a final reco… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
48
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
7
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also note that the theoretical slopes agree quite well with the empirical ones, for both F and FO pulsators. Moreover, the inferred intrinsic mean distance modulus is equal to µ0 = 19.01 mag and its standard deviation to 0.08 mag, in agreement with the most recent literature values (see de Grijs & Bono 2015;Ripepi et al 2016, and references therein).…”
Section: The Pl Relationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We also note that the theoretical slopes agree quite well with the empirical ones, for both F and FO pulsators. Moreover, the inferred intrinsic mean distance modulus is equal to µ0 = 19.01 mag and its standard deviation to 0.08 mag, in agreement with the most recent literature values (see de Grijs & Bono 2015;Ripepi et al 2016, and references therein).…”
Section: The Pl Relationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These CMD regions were defined as in Cioni et al (2014) for the LMC and were adjusted to the different mean distance, extinction, and metallicity of the SMC by applying a shift in magnitude, K s = +0.6, and in colour, (J − K s ) = −0.04 (Cioni et al 2000b). The shift in magnitude is slightly larger than it appears in the latest studies; for example, we obtain ∼0.5 mag from de Bono (2015), but this difference does not influence our investigation. The proper motion of each region was derived from the median of the proper motion of the stars enclosed in the region after the application of a σ-clipping procedure.…”
Section: Smc Areacontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…The Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), in particular, has an intriguing structure with a large extent along the line of sight (e.g. Subramanian & Subramaniam 2012;Nidever et al 2013;de Grijs & Bono 2015, and references therein) and a morphology that clearly depends on stellar population age (e.g. Cioni et al 2000a;Zaritsky et al 2000;Dobbie et al 2014;Subramanian & Subramaniam 2015;Deb et al 2015;Rubele et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LMC and SMC are the two most extensively studied galaxies, and with more than 500 distance determinations from a variety of techniques (de Grijs et al 2014) they are a natural choice for studies aimed at testing the accuracy of the TRGB method. The recent very accurate 2.2% distance measurement to the LMC from eclipsing binaries gives us a unique opportunity to compare different methods, and use the LMC as a very accurate zero-point for distance calibrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%