2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45681-3_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering Ontology-Based Metadata in the Semantic Web

Abstract: The Semantic Web is an extension of the current web in which information is given well-defined meaning, better enabling computers and people to work in cooperation. Recently, different applications based on this vision have been designed, e.g. in the fields of knowledge management, community web portals, e-learning, multimedia retrieval, etc. It is obvious that the complex metadata descriptions generated on the basis of pre-defined ontologies serve as perfect input data for machine learning techniques. In this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
69
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet there are several differences between (Maedche and Staab 2000) and the present work: (Maedche and Staab 2000) is conceived for Ontology Extraction instead of Ontology Refinement, uses generalized association patterns (bottom-up search) instead of multi-level association patterns (top-down search), adopts propositional logic instead of FOL. Within the same application area, (Maedche and Zacharias 2002) proposes a distance-based method for clustering in RDF which is not conceptual. Also the relation between Frequent Pattern Discovery and Concept Formation as such has never been investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet there are several differences between (Maedche and Staab 2000) and the present work: (Maedche and Staab 2000) is conceived for Ontology Extraction instead of Ontology Refinement, uses generalized association patterns (bottom-up search) instead of multi-level association patterns (top-down search), adopts propositional logic instead of FOL. Within the same application area, (Maedche and Zacharias 2002) proposes a distance-based method for clustering in RDF which is not conceptual. Also the relation between Frequent Pattern Discovery and Concept Formation as such has never been investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They stated that the ontology can improve document clustering performance with its concept hierarchy knowledge. This system integrates core ontologies as background knowledge into the process of clustering [14,15].…”
Section: Concept or Feature Weightingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, the concept similarity (CS) value is calculated based on Concept Match and Upwards Cotopy, proposed by Maedche, et al 6) . We have made a subtle extension to their definition in order to be able to compute between concepts, as Maedche, et al defined the equations for computing similarity between what they call "instances".…”
Section: Item Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final similarity score (semantic similarity of item; SOI) is obtained by summing the concept similarity (CS) and the attribute similarity (AS) scores as shown in Eq. (6). The value of SOI ranges from 0 to 2, where 0 represents non-match and 2 represents exact match between the two items.…”
Section: Cs(cmentioning
confidence: 99%