2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18117-2_46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering Relevant Terms and Identifying Types of Statements in Clinical Records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To leverage the acquired terms for NLP, they are typically organized according to their semantic properties. If the target categories are not yet defined, clustering can be used to group semantically related terms and infer taxonomical relations (Siklósi 2015). However, the more common scenario is that the newly acquired variants need to be integrated into an existing knowledge source.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To leverage the acquired terms for NLP, they are typically organized according to their semantic properties. If the target categories are not yet defined, clustering can be used to group semantically related terms and infer taxonomical relations (Siklósi 2015). However, the more common scenario is that the newly acquired variants need to be integrated into an existing knowledge source.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, due to the rare use of verbs, if a past tense verb was recognized in a sentence, it was a good indicator of being part of the anamnesis or the complaints of the patient (Siklósi, 2015).…”
Section: Categorizing Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, using the preprocessed version of the texts, some patterns were identified based on partof-speech tags and the semantic concept categories assigned to the most frequent entities. For example, due to the rare use of verbs, if a past tense verb was recognized in a sentence, it was a good indicator of being part of the anamnesis or the complaints of the patient (Siklósi, 2015).…”
Section: Categorizing Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%