2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2005.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clusters and regional development: Some cautionary observations from the semiconductor industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of these industries' rapidly changing technologies and relatively short product life cycle, innovation is these firms' lifeblood (McCann & Arita, 2006). Firms in the high-tech industry continuously encounter the need for an expanded paradigm in order to understand how competitive advantage is achieved, and successful firms are those that demonstrate timely responsiveness, radical and incremental innovation, and the effective integration of the inside-out and outside-in orientations (Hsieh, Tsai, & Wang, 2008).…”
Section: High-tech Vs Low-tech Industriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of these industries' rapidly changing technologies and relatively short product life cycle, innovation is these firms' lifeblood (McCann & Arita, 2006). Firms in the high-tech industry continuously encounter the need for an expanded paradigm in order to understand how competitive advantage is achieved, and successful firms are those that demonstrate timely responsiveness, radical and incremental innovation, and the effective integration of the inside-out and outside-in orientations (Hsieh, Tsai, & Wang, 2008).…”
Section: High-tech Vs Low-tech Industriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is clear that not each industry park can automatically be considered a cluster, the question is whether such entities develop extended networks of internal relationships, as well as external linkages to other regions and clusters (e.g., Bathelt et al, ), and what the nature of relationships within and between them is. Another interesting question is whether firms choose to locate across these co‐located clusters to take advantage of knowledge spillovers from similar firms and acquire specific capabilities at different locations (Delgado et al, ; Dhandapani, Upadhyayula, & Karna, ; Lecocq, Leten, Kusters, & Van Looy, ; McCann & Folta, ; McCann & Arita, ; Pe'er, Vertinsky, & King, ; Storper, ), or would firms minimize linkage patterns in the same city‐region to prevent unintended intracity, cross‐park knowledge spillovers, and concentrate instead on supra‐local and global connections?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nadvi and Halder (2005) demonstrate that production and knowledge linkages between two clusters: one in Germany and another in Pakistan in the surgical instruments industry. McCann and Arita (2006) find that firms often locate R&D activities close to the headquarters locations, while the choice of locating other activities is driven by external factors such as access to markets, and relative labor and land costs. The literature on multi-plant firm, if viewed from a theoretical lens of new economic geography and multiple cluster perspective, can provide interesting Why do firms locate across multiple clusters?…”
Section: Locating Across Multiple Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%