2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22116081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CMAS and ST3GAL4 Play an Important Role in the Adsorption of Influenza Virus by Affecting the Synthesis of Sialic Acid Receptors

Abstract: Influenza A viruses (IAVs) initiate infection by attaching Hemagglutinin (HA) on the viral envelope to sialic acid (SA) receptors on the cell surface. Importantly, HA of human IAVs has a higher affinity for α-2,6-linked SA receptors, and avian strains prefer α-2,3-linked SA receptors, whereas swine strains have a strong affinity for both SA receptors. Host gene CMAS and ST3GAL4 were found to be essential for IAV attachment and entry. Loss of CMAS and ST3GAL4 hindered the synthesis of sialic acid receptors, whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Binding of both φ-CBM 290 and φ-Siglec7 20 to cytidine monophosphate N- acetylneuraminic acid synthase (CMAS) deficient (CMAS KO ) U937 cells was decreased (Fig. 2b) because CMAS KO cannot produce sialic acid; binding of φ-CBM 290 to CMAS KO was minor (< 5% of binding of φ-CBM 290 to WT) and reminiscent of published observations of binding of sialic acid binding lectins to CMAS KO cells 39 . In all these experiments, we observed no differences in binding between φ-MBP 140 and blank phages (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Binding of both φ-CBM 290 and φ-Siglec7 20 to cytidine monophosphate N- acetylneuraminic acid synthase (CMAS) deficient (CMAS KO ) U937 cells was decreased (Fig. 2b) because CMAS KO cannot produce sialic acid; binding of φ-CBM 290 to CMAS KO was minor (< 5% of binding of φ-CBM 290 to WT) and reminiscent of published observations of binding of sialic acid binding lectins to CMAS KO cells 39 . In all these experiments, we observed no differences in binding between φ-MBP 140 and blank phages (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In contrast to previous genome-scale CRISPR screens primarily focused on the isolated human or avian influenza virus in their hosts, our study initiated a genome-scale CRISPR screen in porcine kidney cells to identify the host-dependency factors necessary for EA H1N1 SIV infection 24,28,32 . Shared hits with other studies highlighted the enrichment of host factors involved in SA receptor biosynthesis and related glycosylation pathways, including SLC35A1, CMAS, ST3GAL4, and ALG5, emphasizing the critical role of SA receptor biosynthesis in multiple IAV strains 28,33 . Additionally, unique genes specific to the EA H1N1 SIV strain (HuB/H1N1) and its corresponding host were identified, indicating their specific involvement in EA H1N1 SIV infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Similarly, when the time of NanH treatment was extended up to 4 h, no further decrease in SNA or MAL-II binding was observed compared to a 30 min treatment time (Figure S2b). Residual lectin binding signal may be attributed to trace cell-surface sialic acids that were inaccessible to the sialidase or background SNA binding which has been observed in studies with sialic acid-deficient CMAS knockout cell lines …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Residual lectin binding signal may be attributed to trace cell-surface sialic acids that were inaccessible to the sialidase or background SNA binding which has been observed in studies with sialic acid-deficient CMAS knockout cell lines. 43 After enzymatic desialylation using 50 μg/mL NanH, α-2,6linked Neu5DAz was installed by treating desialylated cells with 200 μM CMP-Neu5Daz (1) and 20 μg/mL ST6GAL1 for 2 h. Remodeling desialylated SK-BR-3 and RAJI cells with CMP-Neu5DAz (1) and ST6GAL1 restored SNA binding (Figure 2a,d), whereas SNA binding was higher than control MCF-7, HS-578-T, and U937 cells (Figure 2b,c,e) after remodeling with CMP-Neu5DAz (1) and ST6GAL1. These results demonstrate efficient incorporation of the Neu5DAz probe onto cell-surface glycoconjugates across the various cell lines examined.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%