2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.stamet.2007.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CMB data analysis and sparsity

Abstract: The statistical analysis of the soon to come Planck satellite CMB data will help set tighter bounds on major cosmological parameters. On the way, a number of practical difficulties need to be tackled, notably that several other astrophysical sources emit radiation in the frequency range of CMB observations. Some level of residual contributions, most significantly in the galactic region and at the locations of strong radio point sources will unavoidably contaminate the estimated spherical CMB map. Masking out t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) The  method consists of inpainting the Galactic mask as well as the point-source holes, using the sparse-inpainting algorithm described in Abrial et al (2007Abrial et al ( , 2008. The resulting map resembles a full-sky CMB map, and therefore has no mask mean-field contribution.…”
Section: Alternative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) The  method consists of inpainting the Galactic mask as well as the point-source holes, using the sparse-inpainting algorithm described in Abrial et al (2007Abrial et al ( , 2008. The resulting map resembles a full-sky CMB map, and therefore has no mask mean-field contribution.…”
Section: Alternative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sparse inpainting has been proposed for filling the gaps in CMB maps (Abrial et al 2007(Abrial et al , 2008 and for weak-lensing mass map reconstruction (Pires et al 2009(Pires et al , 2010. In Perotto et al (2010), it has been shown that the sparse inpainting method does not destroy the CMB weak-lensing signal, and is therefore an elegant way to handle the mask problem.…”
Section: Appendix A: Sparse Inpaintingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown in Abrial et al (2008) that this inpainting technique leads to accurate CMB recovery results. More details relative to this optimisation problem can be found in Combettes & Wajs (2005); Starck et al (2010) and theoretical justifications for CMB sparse inpainting in Rauhut & Ward (2010).…”
Section: Appendix A: Sparse Inpaintingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we add spatially inhomogeneous noise, which most certainly affects the results of the algorithm. Among the inpainting algorithm implemented within the multi-resolution on the sphere (MRS) package 4 , we found that the most robust results are obtained with the spherical harmonics L 1 norm minimization using wavelet packet variance regularization (Abrial et al 2007(Abrial et al , 2008.…”
Section: Update On the Fs-inpainting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%