“…The only other patient described to have a Ph(−) B-ALL, and subsequently develop CML, is a 12-year-old female initially diagnosed in 2003. 7 Other, earlier case reports that purportedly described patients presenting with initial Ph(−) ALL diagnoses, followed by CML being detected at a later time, are questionable because of the limitations in ancillary techniques available for a complete workup; 8 lack of cytogenetic information at the time of ALL diagnosis; 9 questionable diagnosis of CML, due to lack of the characteristic t(9;22) translocation; 10,11 and/or the presence of a Ph chromosome at the time of ALL diagnosis, which favors an interpretation of lymphoblastic BP CML (rather than de novo ALL). 12,13…”