2001
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-1-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CMV infection of liver transplant recipients: comparison of antigenemia and molecular biology assays

Abstract: Background: CMV is a major clinical problem in transplant recipients. Thus, it is important to use sensitive and specific diagnostic techniques to rapidly and accurately detect CMV infection and identify patients at risk of developing CMV disease. In the present study, CMV infection after liver transplantation was monitored retrospectively by two molecular biology assays -a quantitative PCR assay and a qualitative NASBA assay. The results were compared with those obtained by prospective pp65 antigenemia determ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It represents the centroid of the latter. ment (transplant recipients) [Pellegrin et al, 2000;Amorim et al, 2001;Kulkarni et al, 2001;Hebart et al, 2002]. However, the present report is the first concurrent quantitative real-time detection of CMV DNA by TaqMan method, pp65 antigenemia, and pp67 RNA assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It represents the centroid of the latter. ment (transplant recipients) [Pellegrin et al, 2000;Amorim et al, 2001;Kulkarni et al, 2001;Hebart et al, 2002]. However, the present report is the first concurrent quantitative real-time detection of CMV DNA by TaqMan method, pp65 antigenemia, and pp67 RNA assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In immunocompromised patients, especially after organ transplantation, rapid, sensitive and reliable detection of HCMV infection is necessary (Amorim et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not suitable for routine monitoring of patients on treatment [57]…why not???. It is a quick (4-6 hours), specific and extremely sensitive test but false positives may result from contamination during the test run.…”
Section: Polymerase Chain Reaction-pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is fast, direct and sensitive, and is considered a quantitative technique for viral load [54,55]. CMV antigenemia is one of the earlier tests with positive results [17,25,[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] and becomes positive on average 9-18 days before establishment of the disease. It has been widely used for the early detection of active infection in organ transplant recipients [17,24,25,36,56].…”
Section: Immunofluorescence (If)mentioning
confidence: 99%