2022
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2020.3027382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CNN-Based Change Detection Algorithm for Wavelength-Resolution SAR Images

Abstract: This letter presents an incoherent change detection algorithm (CDA) for wavelength-resolution synthetic aperture radar (SAR) based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The proposed CDA includes a segmentation CNN, which localizes potential changes, and a classification CNN, which further analyzes these candidates to classify them as real changes or false alarms. Compared to state-of-the-art solutions on the CARABAS-II data set, the proposed CDA shows a significant improvement in performance, achieving, in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using this algorithm, we achieved a probability of detection of 97% and a false alarm rate of 0.034/km 2 , while other algorithms such as [3] presented a P d of 97% and a FAR= 0.67/km 2 . More recent algorithms such as [4], achieved a P d of around 97% and a FAR= 0.28/km 2 , [16] achieved a P d of about 97% and a FAR= 0.0313/km 2 , and [15] achieved a P d of around 99% and a FAR= 0.0833/km 2 , respectively. It worth mentioning that methods presented in [16], [15] are based on more complex CNN with greater time complexity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using this algorithm, we achieved a probability of detection of 97% and a false alarm rate of 0.034/km 2 , while other algorithms such as [3] presented a P d of 97% and a FAR= 0.67/km 2 . More recent algorithms such as [4], achieved a P d of around 97% and a FAR= 0.28/km 2 , [16] achieved a P d of about 97% and a FAR= 0.0313/km 2 , and [15] achieved a P d of around 99% and a FAR= 0.0833/km 2 , respectively. It worth mentioning that methods presented in [16], [15] are based on more complex CNN with greater time complexity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…More recent algorithms such as [4], achieved a P d of around 97% and a FAR= 0.28/km 2 , [16] achieved a P d of about 97% and a FAR= 0.0313/km 2 , and [15] achieved a P d of around 99% and a FAR= 0.0833/km 2 , respectively. It worth mentioning that methods presented in [16], [15] are based on more complex CNN with greater time complexity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We present the performance evaluation over the only publicly available data set for this class of SAR system. Multiple CNN architectures were not tested since the main objective of this article is to evaluate how much the use of stacks of WR-SAR images can improve the performance of a baseline CNN-based CDA for WR-SAR images, presented in [36].…”
Section: A Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed CDAs search for positive changes in the monitored image and can be summarized into four stages: (i) difference image formation; (ii) semantic segmentation; (iii) clustering; and (iv) classification of changes. The CNN-GSP uses a ground scene prediction image, produced by fusing a WR-SAR stack into a single image, as a reference for change detection, which is then fed to the CDA presented in [36]. On the other hand, the CNN-MDI algorithm uses the images contained in a WR-SAR data stack as references to generate multiple difference images with identical monitored images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%