2003
DOI: 10.1021/jp030499u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO Adsorption on Au(110)−(1 × 2):  An IRAS Investigation

Abstract: IRAS studies of CO adsorption on the Au(110)-(1 × 2) surface were performed as a function of CO pressure and sample temperature. It was found that with increasing coverage, the CO IRAS absorption shifts red from 2118 to 2108 cm -1 . Clausius-Clapeyron data analysis yielded a heat of CO adsorption (-∆H ads ) of 10.9 kcal/mol at low coverages and 7.8 kcal/mol at coverages greater than 19%.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

29
87
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
29
87
1
Order By: Relevance
“…34 The infrared data can be interpreted in terms of surface coverage (described in detail below) and are plotted in Figure 4. Extrapolation of this plot to θ ) 1 yields a full-coverage CO stretching frequency of 2103.5 cm -1 , in excellent agreement with measurements on model UHV systems 19,[22][23][24][25] and higherpressure studies with other supported Au catalysts. 26 The integrated peak area (S) was used to quantify the CO adsorption.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…34 The infrared data can be interpreted in terms of surface coverage (described in detail below) and are plotted in Figure 4. Extrapolation of this plot to θ ) 1 yields a full-coverage CO stretching frequency of 2103.5 cm -1 , in excellent agreement with measurements on model UHV systems 19,[22][23][24][25] and higherpressure studies with other supported Au catalysts. 26 The integrated peak area (S) was used to quantify the CO adsorption.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Although this model may be an oversimplification, there are a number of literature reports describing two different CO adsorption regimes on model gold catalysts. 24,25,42 Alternately, a Langmuir model with a coverage-dependent binding constant (and therefore binding energy) can be used to explain the differences in CO binding energy at low and high coverage. The fitting is accomplished using a sliding-tangent Langmuir expression, which also does a good job of describing the experimental data (the solid line through the data in Figure 6 nearly overlaps the two-site model fit).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpretation suggested above is fully consistent with that proposed by Goodman et al 9 for the same adsorption process on a Au(110) 1 © 2 reconstructed model surface at much lower temperature (100250 K) and CO partial pressure (1 © 10 ¹8 1 © 10 ¹4 Torr). As recently discussed, 41 this model surface actually consists of intersecting nanosized [111] planes in which sites with CN = 7 (25%), CN = 9 (50%), and CN = 11 (25%) coexist.…”
Section: ç 3 Nanostructural Analysis Of the Au Sites For Co Adsorptionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The adsorption of CO on bare Au single crystals of low Miller index such as (111), (100) and (110) has been explored in the past by various authors [20][21][22] . Even though these results were obtained by adsorbing CO at low temperatures, they provide an interesting framework to understand the reactiveness of Au surfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, Meier et al 21 reported that for a Au (110) surface, for temperatures above 250 K, the adsorption of CO is discarded for by means of infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy data at pressures in the mbar range. These results agree very well with the absence of adsorbed CO on Au(332) observed from HRCL spectra of Figure 1b The role of under-coordinated atoms in the adsorptive properties of Au surfaces has been discussed by Mehmood et al 20 and the calculated energy of adsorption of CO on flat, stepped and kinked Au reveals a stronger adsorption on under-coordinated atoms; although, the energies of adsorption obtained are considerably smaller than for Pt surfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%