Co-authorship networks and research impact in large research facilities: benchmarking internal reports and bibliometric databases

Abstract

License: Article 25fa pilot End User Agreement This publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act (Auteurswet) with explicit consent by the author. Dutch law entitles the maker of a short scientific work funded either wholly or partially by Dutch public funds to make that work publicly available for no consideration following a reasonable period of time after the work was first published, provided that clear reference is made to the source of the first publication of the work. This publication is distributed under The Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU) 'Article 25fa implementation' pilot project. In this pilot research outputs of researchers employed by Dutch Universities that comply with the legal requirements of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act are distributed online and free of cost or other barriers in institutional repositories. Research outputs are distributed six months after their first online publication in the original published version and with proper attribution to the source of the original publication. You are permitted to download and use the publication for personal purposes. All rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyrights owner(s) of this work. Any use of the publication other than authorised under this licence or copyright law is prohibited. If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons.

Better, Faster, Stronger: The Evolution of Co-authorship in International Management Research Between 1990 and 2016

“…Our study shows that collaborations between scholars, universities and countries have grown considerably between the first (1990–1997) and second (1998–2008) periods and to a lesser extent between the second and third (2009–2016) periods. The increase of collaboration over time is consistent with former co-authorship analyses (Acedo et al, 2006; Bozeman & Youtie, 2017; Eckl et al, 2019; Glänzel & Schubert, 2005; Silva et al, 2019; Wagner et al, 2017; Youtie & Bozeman, 2016) and indicates that international management went from a phase of emergence as a field of research to an era of consolidation and contestation. As such, academic collaboration is increasingly guided by a few centers of research that appear to be the drivers of the evolution of international management.…”

Bibliometric Analysis of the Journal of Civil Engineering and Management Between 2008 and 2018

“…Regarding the number of authors which refer to the degree of co-authorship (Köseoglu, Okumus, Putra, Yildiz, & Dogan, 2018;Silva, Schulz, & Noyons, 2019), the most popular pattern of co-authorship is 2 or 3 authors (58.59%). Furthermore, a substantial increase occurred in the average number of authors during the whole period.…”

Domain expertise extraction for finding rising stars

“…Vrabic proposed a scientific network for the structuring of the community's expertise (Vrabic et al, 2018). Other relevant work incorporates social network indicators, such as the number of co-authors, co-author citations (Ding et al, 2018;Panagopoulos et al, 2017;Silva et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2018).…”