2000
DOI: 10.1108/07363760010357796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co‐branding: brand equity and trial effects

Abstract: Co‐branding is an increasingly popular technique marketers use in attempting to transfer the positive associations of the partner (constituent) brands to a newly formed co‐brand (composite brand). This research examines the effects of co‐branding on the brand equity of both the co‐branded product and the constituent brands that comprise it, both before and after product trial. It appears that co‐branding is a win/win strategy for both co‐branding partners regardless of whether the original brands are perceived… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
231
0
11

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
231
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of theoretical contribution, this paper makes an original connection between four topics: motivations of inter-industry creative collaborations (Blackett and Boad, 1999;Dorozola and Kohlbrenner, 2008;Breckenfeld, 2009;Washburn et al, 2000), major category assets of consumer-based brand equity (Aaker, 1996), consumers' attitudes towards inter-industry creative collaborations ( James, 2006) and the creative and emotional elements of luxury fashion (Tungate, 2009;Chadha and Husband, 2006;Okonkwo, 2007;Thomas, 1993). It provides a useful starting point for further empirical research to test the validity and reliability of the model outside of the stated cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of theoretical contribution, this paper makes an original connection between four topics: motivations of inter-industry creative collaborations (Blackett and Boad, 1999;Dorozola and Kohlbrenner, 2008;Breckenfeld, 2009;Washburn et al, 2000), major category assets of consumer-based brand equity (Aaker, 1996), consumers' attitudes towards inter-industry creative collaborations ( James, 2006) and the creative and emotional elements of luxury fashion (Tungate, 2009;Chadha and Husband, 2006;Okonkwo, 2007;Thomas, 1993). It provides a useful starting point for further empirical research to test the validity and reliability of the model outside of the stated cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emotional nature of such partnerships focuses this paper on marketing objectives that motivate business collaboration, notably to generate a point of differentiation (Washburn et al, 2000;Aaker, 1996); to increase the influence of a brand (Blackett and Boad, 1999;Dorozola and Kohlbrenner, 2008;Breckenfeld, 2009); and to enter new product categories (Blackett and Boad, 1999;Aaker, 1996). Dorozala and Kohlbrenner (2008) identified diverse types of fit between partners participating in a business collaboration: objective fit, value fit, market fit, target group fit, image fit and status fit.…”
Section: Objectives Driving Inter-industry Creative Collaborationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-branding with sustainability labels creates added value for the customer (Sorsa and Kettunen, 2015). Co-branding is an accepted method that the marketers often take resort to in trying to transfer the positive associations of the partner brands to a newly formed co-brand (Washburn et al, 2000). The consumer is not, however, the end of the process because of the environment degradation and other impacts.…”
Section: Sustainable Engagement In a Value Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brand equity is a strategic imperative for many organisations, particularly those, such as mobile phone manufacturers that operate in highly competitive and dynamic industries (Washburn, Till & Priluck, 2000;Yoo, Donthu & Lee, 2000;Kabadayi, Aygün & Çipli, 2007). The concept of brand equity may be viewed from two broad perspectives -the financialbased perspective and the consumer-based perspective (Lasser, Mittal & Sharma, 1995;Wood, 2000;Pappu, Quester & Cooksey, 2005).…”
Section: Relationship Between Social Image Brand Trust Brand Loyaltmentioning
confidence: 99%