2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-46734-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-change Clusters: Extraction and Application on Assessing Software Modularity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
12
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We also investigate the issue of restructuring a software based on co-evolution clusters, and we found that a clustered-based decomposition leads to small improvements on system modularity (7.68% on average). This finding contrasts with previous works [70,79,16] that suggest that the analysis of co-change clusters might serve as guidance to developers in the challenging task of redesigning a software.…”
Section: Chapter Abstractcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We also investigate the issue of restructuring a software based on co-evolution clusters, and we found that a clustered-based decomposition leads to small improvements on system modularity (7.68% on average). This finding contrasts with previous works [70,79,16] that suggest that the analysis of co-change clusters might serve as guidance to developers in the challenging task of redesigning a software.…”
Section: Chapter Abstractcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…An MDG must only contain edges with a minimum support. To aid the clustering algorithm to produce clusters with better quality, we assign the support metric as the weight of each edge, similarly to [70]. The confidence metric measures the strength of a dependency between two entities, and is defined as:…”
Section: Extracting Co-change Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations