2014
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2014.2341628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-Channel Interference Modeling in Cognitive Wireless Networks

Abstract: Cognitive radio is a promising technology for sharing the underutilized frequency bands that have been licensed to primary users. However, due to the uncertainty in detecting the existence of the primary user, the secondary user may interfere with the primary users when both primary and secondary users are active simultaneously. Therefore, understanding the interference and its consequences on the cognitive network is critical. Unlike the statistical models previously reported in the literature that aim at app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Li et al have presented the probability of outage over the Nakagami‐ m fading channel by considering interference for primary users of a cognitive network, they have not included average detection probability ( truePnormalD¯) in their analysis. In contrast to Li et al, this research paper not only includes analysis of truePnormalD¯ but also considered the most generic fading channel, namely, the MG fading channel, in place of the Nakagami‐ m fading channel.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Li et al have presented the probability of outage over the Nakagami‐ m fading channel by considering interference for primary users of a cognitive network, they have not included average detection probability ( truePnormalD¯) in their analysis. In contrast to Li et al, this research paper not only includes analysis of truePnormalD¯ but also considered the most generic fading channel, namely, the MG fading channel, in place of the Nakagami‐ m fading channel.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has studied the aggregated interference from DSA/CR users surrounding a primary receiver [20], [22], [23], the outage probability of a primary system caused by the interference from a DSA/CR network for underlay and overlay spectrum sharing [24], the region of communication and interference for the users of a DSA/CR system that coexists with a cellular network [25], the interference to wireless microphones in TV bands [26], and refinements including shadowing and fading effects [27], [28] and power control in the secondary DSA/CR network [29].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (23), M ij d is obtained by replacing all the blocks in M except for M ij by m × m zero matrices, with ∆M ij d respectively a perturbation in M ij d . The term ̺ is the combined effect of the background noise in both forward and feedback channels [33].…”
Section: Network Stability In the Presence Of Uncertainty And Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…must be kept below a certain threshold. • In the overlay paradigm, secondary users must have perfect knowledge about both primary and secondary users as well as the communication channels between them [23]. Sophisticated radio architectures are needed to use this knowledge and try to keep the interference caused by the secondary network on the primary network at the minimum level possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%