2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-considering Selenium Concentrations Alters Mercury-Based Fish and Seafood Consumption Advice: A Data Compilation and Critical Assessment

Abstract: There has been persistent interest in the mediating role of the micronutrient selenium (Se) in mercury (Hg) toxicity since the 1960s. Despite many unresolved questions regarding Se− Hg interactions, considerable research has been performed to document Se:Hg molar ratios in aquatic animals as a basis for inferring the health risks associated with their consumption. We compiled the co-reported Se and Hg data for 386 shellfish, finfish, and aquatic mammals from 89 papers to assess differences in consumption safet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that a wide range of animal species are protected from Hg toxicity by a Se : Hg molar ratio >1:1, and that this phenomenon prevails over a broad range of environmental conditions, Se should be factored into Hg toxicity assessments for humans to avoid suppressing human consumption, and for wildlife to avoid undue alarm. Not only does excess Se protect fi sh from Hg toxicity, Se also protects the human and wildlife consumers of fi sh (Ujang and Perkins 2022 ;Zampetti and Brandt 2023 ). In addition, the benefi ts derived from consuming marine and most freshwater fi sh outweigh the potential damages of MeHg exposure from consumption of most fi sh (Hibbeln et al 2007 ;Oken et al 2008 ;Ralston et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that a wide range of animal species are protected from Hg toxicity by a Se : Hg molar ratio >1:1, and that this phenomenon prevails over a broad range of environmental conditions, Se should be factored into Hg toxicity assessments for humans to avoid suppressing human consumption, and for wildlife to avoid undue alarm. Not only does excess Se protect fi sh from Hg toxicity, Se also protects the human and wildlife consumers of fi sh (Ujang and Perkins 2022 ;Zampetti and Brandt 2023 ). In addition, the benefi ts derived from consuming marine and most freshwater fi sh outweigh the potential damages of MeHg exposure from consumption of most fi sh (Hibbeln et al 2007 ;Oken et al 2008 ;Ralston et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that sequestering of Se by high Hg levels, which prohibits selenoprotein production, is not a widespread regional phenomenon-despite the prevalence of fi sh consumption advisories for Hg alone (Stahl et al 2009(Stahl et al , 2023. Given the importance of including fi sh in a healthy diet (Ralston et al 2019 ;Zampetti and Brandt 2023 ), Se values must be factored into MeHg toxicity assessments when establishing fi sh consumption advisories to assess Hg toxicity potential more accurately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, molecular interactions between the two elements are not yet fully understood, and the protection of Se against long-term exposure to Hg remains to be definitely proven [98]. For this reason, in a very recent review of the available data on Hg in seafood and the potential risks to consumer health, Zampetti and Barndt [99] concluded that approaches to consumer safety based on the 1:1 (Se:Hg) molar ratio are likely premature.…”
Section: Methylmercury Biomagnification In Mediterranean Food Webs An...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mercury is a chalcophile element (having affinity for a sulphide phase) and extremely active biologically. A complex relationship exists between Hg and Se (also primarily chalcophilic in character) with reference to toxicity effects (Zampetti and Brandt, 2023), with co-exposure leading to reduced toxicity (antagonism; See, e,g., Oliveira et al, 2017;Tinggi and Perkins, 2022), enhanced toxicity (synergism), or no effect at all (See: Wyatt et al, 2016). Different interactions may be related to chemical speciation, concentration, and method of administration (Dang and Wang, 2011); but these have not been thoroughly studied.…”
Section: Associations (Synergism/antagonism)mentioning
confidence: 99%