2016
DOI: 10.1093/iwc/iww025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-constructing Meaning and Negotiating Participation: Ethical Tensions when ‘Giving Voice’ through Digital Storytelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Co-creation is a "sophisticated, valuebased, context-driven, collaborative effort to develop new paradigms, products, and services to satisfy human wants" (Akhilesh, 2017, p. 2). Co-creation was observed in several ways: (a) support given by facilitators to the older adults to create the digital story (Crete-Nishihata et al, 2012;Hamilton & Atkinson, 2009;Stenhouse et al, 2013); (b) participatory design (Damianakis et al, 2010;Njeru et al, 2015;Smith et al, 2009;Subramaniam & Woods, 2016); and (c) active engagement of older adults during the digital storytelling process (Briant et al, 2016;Waycott et al, 2017). Stenhouse et al (2013) proposed that digital storytelling is an arts-based method of representing experience of a person living with dementia.…”
Section: Processes and Methods Utilized To Develop The Storiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Co-creation is a "sophisticated, valuebased, context-driven, collaborative effort to develop new paradigms, products, and services to satisfy human wants" (Akhilesh, 2017, p. 2). Co-creation was observed in several ways: (a) support given by facilitators to the older adults to create the digital story (Crete-Nishihata et al, 2012;Hamilton & Atkinson, 2009;Stenhouse et al, 2013); (b) participatory design (Damianakis et al, 2010;Njeru et al, 2015;Smith et al, 2009;Subramaniam & Woods, 2016); and (c) active engagement of older adults during the digital storytelling process (Briant et al, 2016;Waycott et al, 2017). Stenhouse et al (2013) proposed that digital storytelling is an arts-based method of representing experience of a person living with dementia.…”
Section: Processes and Methods Utilized To Develop The Storiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public viewing (n = 2) Hausknecht et al (2016Hausknecht et al ( , 2017 Communication and social connection (with broader community) 2 (5.9) Waycott et al (2017), Williams et al (2017) Communication to inform care provision from service providers 2 (5.9)…”
Section: Outcomes Of Digital Storytelling and Level Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section focuses on our takeaways related to the third research question regarding our collaboration with human rights organizations (RQ3). As previous research has stated, "giving voice" through technology is not a straightforward task considering the relations established between the HCI researchers, stakeholders, and participants [131]. Furthermore, we (the research team) recognize a limitation in our reliance on the MNM in our work.…”
Section: Reflections On Interdisciplinary Work For Sensitive Narrativesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, to further the discussion in HCI about learning and collaborating with professionals in the domain of human rights and victimization stories, we refect on the roles of our collaboration and the implications of working with the museum staf as "value advocates" instead of working directly with the victims whose stories the MNM collects. In this way, we contribute to HCI discussion around co-creation and "giving voice" [131] to others through research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Setting or blurring boundaries A common and related challenge when working closely with vulnerable or marginalized participants is maintaining boundaries around the researcher's role and the setting of the research [23]. Much of the research that has been discussed at our workshops to date involved extended periods of time working with participants in field studies.…”
Section: Workhopmentioning
confidence: 99%