Co‐contributorship network and division of labor in individual scientific collaborations

Abstract

Collaborations are pervasive in current science. Collaborations have been studied and encouraged in many disciplines. However, little is known about how a team really functions from the detailed division of labor within. In this research, we investigate the patterns of scientific collaboration and division of labor within individual scholarly articles by analyzing their co‐contributorship networks. Co‐contributorship networks are constructed by performing the one‐mode projection of the author–task bipartite networks obtained from 138,787 articles published in PLoS journals. Given an article, we define 3 types of contributors: Specialists, Team‐players, and Versatiles. Specialists are those who contribute to all their tasks alone; team‐players are those who contribute to every task with other collaborators; and versatiles are those who do both. We find that team‐players are the majority and they tend to contribute to the 5 most common tasks as expected, such as “data analysis” and “performing experiments.” The specialists and versatiles are more prevalent than expected by our designed 2 null models. Versatiles tend to be senior authors associated with funding and supervision. Specialists are associated with 2 contrasting roles: the supervising role as team leaders or marginal and specialized contributors.

The impact of Ph.D., funding, and continued publications by Sports Sciences PhDs, 1-year post PhD-Defence

“…The latter would refer to the so-called "author credit assessment": the prestige or importance of the author in the collaboration. A recent study published in the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology and conducted by Lu et al (2019) aimed to better understand scientific collaboration. These authors concluded that the author's value is granted by the authors' position, either uniformly or differently (Lu et al, 2019;Stallings et al, 2013).…”

The Collaboration Patterns of Institution during the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…The scientific cooperation network is a network that forms naturally during scientific research. It is widely used to study the formation and evolution of collaboration [37][38][39], the measurement of contribution in cooperation [40,41], the influence of cooperative team composition on scientific research performance [18,42], predicting the possible coauthors for scientists [43], etc. In the scientific cooperation network, nodes represent cooperators and links represent cooperation relationships [44].…”

Quién es quién en la red de coautoría en Colombia

“…Existen diversas hipótesis -no excluyentes-que buscan explicar el aumento en la coautoría (Katz & Martin, 1997;Hollis, 2001;Lu et al, 2019;O'Hagan & Kuld, 2020). La primera tiene que ver con la división del trabajo, según la cual, la coautoría permite aprovechar la especialización de los autores para enfrentar la mayor exigencia e interdisciplinariedad del mundo académico.…”