Co-Creating a Blended Learning Curriculum in Transition to Higher Education: A Student Viewpoint

Abstract

Involving students in the design and development of their curriculum is well established in Higher Education but comes with challenges and concerns for both the staff and students. This is not a simple concept and understanding more about the experiences of the student co-creators supports others in developing this aspect of curriculum design. This small scale project uses the individual and collective voices of five second year students who worked with one programme team to co-create a transition module to support new learners entering university. The study explores the co-creation experience and the student's response to the feedback their co-created curriculum received when it was run for the first time. The study was designed to consider if co-creation of a module was beneficial to the students involved in its co-creation. The findings explored issues in relation to the experience, the actual design of the materials and how this could be developed. The students enjoyed the co-creation, felt appreciated and listened to and felt that this was a positive learning experience. They realised how difficult it is to please everybody and gained a much better appreciation of building learning experiences for others to use. The research highlights the fact that with regards to curriculum development within universities that students should be involved in co-creation as they have an understanding of the requirements of learning form a student perspective. Whilst student satisfaction cannot be necessarily be measured directly, the anecdotal comments from students involved in this project as they graduate are the values they place on the opportunities afforded to them. KeywordsStudents Co-Creating the Curriculum, Blended Learning, Students' Engagement J. Money et al. 1206

Playing the game: a realist approach to evaluating online student access, retention, progression and attainment initiatives

“…Research has focussed on the capacity for such interventions to develop confidence of where to seek help (Crosling, Heagney, and Thomas 2009;Currant and Keenan 2009;Lefever and Currant 2010;O'Donnell, Kean, and Stevens 2016;Tchen et al 2018;Turner et al 2017;Webb and Cotton 2018), with evidence suggesting that the more informed students are, the less likely they are to leave university before completion (Brooman and Darwent 2014;Laing, Robinson, and Johnston 2005;Money et al 2016).…”

B-learning in english language teaching in higher education: a systematic review

“…The merits and benefits of the b-learning approach to optimize English language teaching are evident in the results of countless influential studies as an approach that actively engages students (Halverson et al, 2014;Money et al, 2016;Woodfield et al, 2016). which is considered by many academics as "the new normal" in education due to its high adoption rate, popularity and perceived benefits (Dziuban et al, 2018;Pham & Ho, 2020;Saboowala & Manghirmalani, 2018).…”

Co-creation, contexts, and complexity: a case study concerning blended learning.

“…including both face-toface and online delivery. In preparing the intervention, we identified previous projects where students had initially been seen as pedagogic consultantsto review course amendments proposed by academic staff (Money et al, 2016) and then became more proactively involved in the construction process. McPherson and Heggie (2015) stress the advantages that come from the involvement of students in these ways: making them active agents, engaging them as active learners and, in consequence of these, establishing them as pedagogic partners.…”