Co-creation as social innovation: including ‘hard-to-reach’ groups in public service delivery

Eseonu, Temidayo

doi:10.1080/09540962.2021.1981057

Cited by 9 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is evidence beyond CoSIE as well as within it that co-creation and social innovation can provide the methods for enacting initial engagements with socially excluded or seldom heard population groups. Eseonu (2022), for example, shows how this has been achieved with racially minoritised young people in a hyper-diverse British city. Yet there seems much left to do in terms of understanding how social innovation is propagated, the tools (including digital tools) that are utilised, relationships to existing institutional structures, and wider theories of social welfare and social policy.…”

Section: Learning From Co-creating?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Co-creation in Public Services for Innovation and Social Justice

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Learning From Co-creating?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Co-creation in Public Services for Innovation and Social Justice

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Co-design is an approach being widely adopted in research, policy, and service design, and refers to the active and deliberate involvement of different stakeholders in exploring, developing and evaluating initiatives ( O’Brien and Vincent, 2003 ; Boyd et al, 2012 ; Blomkamp, 2018 ; Bevir et al, 2019 ; Close et al, 2021 ; Eseonu, 2022 ). Not only is co-design a tool for better decision making, but it also considers the influence of existing power dynamics and inequalities, and gives stakeholders an opportunity to address fractionization ( Bevir et al, 2019 ).…”

Section: Co-design Of the Ethics Statementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

ARC: a framework for access, reciprocity and conduct in psychedelic therapies

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The field of psychedelic assisted therapy (PAT) is growing at an unprecedented pace. The immense pressures this places on those working in this burgeoning field have already begun to raise important questions about risk and responsibility. It is imperative that the development of an ethical and equitable infrastructure for psychedelic care is prioritized to support this rapid expansion of PAT in research and clinical settings. Here we present Access, Reciprocity and Conduct (ARC); a framework for a culturally informed ethical infrastructure for ARC in psychedelic therapies. These three parallel yet interdependent pillars of ARC provide the bedrock for a sustainable psychedelic infrastructure which prioritized equal access to PAT for those in need of mental health treatment (Access), promotes the safety of those delivering and receiving PAT in clinical contexts (Conduct), and respects the traditional and spiritual uses of psychedelic medicines which often precede their clinical use (Reciprocity). In the development of ARC, we are taking a novel dual-phase co-design approach. The first phase involves co-development of an ethics statement for each arm with stakeholders from research, industry, therapy, community, and indigenous settings. A second phase will further disseminate the statements for collaborative review to a wider audience from these different stakeholder communities within the psychedelic therapy field to invite feedback and further refinement. By presenting ARC at this early stage, we hope to draw upon the collective wisdom of the wider psychedelic community and inspire the open dialogue and collaboration upon which the process of co-design depends. We aim to offer a framework through which psychedelic researchers, therapists and other stakeholders, may begin tackling the complex ethical questions arising within their own organizations and individual practice of PAT.

show abstract