Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Belonging is critical for the development and well-being of medical students. Feeling a sense of belonging is a significant challenge for medical students within the melee of modern clinical environments. Co-creation is a learning relationship in which students are actively involved in the education process. It is inherently relational and promotes belonging within higher education environments. Little is known about using co-creation in the clinical learning environment, within medical education, or how medical students experience this type of learning structure. This article presents an example of using co-creation during paediatric placement and its evaluation. It then gives practical advice for using co-creation within the reader’s own practice, as a paediatric clinician and teacher.
Belonging is critical for the development and well-being of medical students. Feeling a sense of belonging is a significant challenge for medical students within the melee of modern clinical environments. Co-creation is a learning relationship in which students are actively involved in the education process. It is inherently relational and promotes belonging within higher education environments. Little is known about using co-creation in the clinical learning environment, within medical education, or how medical students experience this type of learning structure. This article presents an example of using co-creation during paediatric placement and its evaluation. It then gives practical advice for using co-creation within the reader’s own practice, as a paediatric clinician and teacher.
Background Web-based information and social support are commonly used in rare disease communities where geographic dispersion and limited provider expertise complicate in-person support. We examined web-based resource use among caregivers of individuals with telomere biology disorders (TBDs), which are rare genetic conditions with long diagnostic odysseys and uncertain prognoses including multiorgan system cancer risk. Objective This study explored internet-based information-seeking and social support practices and perspectives of patients with TBDs and their caregivers. Methods Our qualitative descriptive study used semistructured interviews of patients with TBDs and caregivers. Data were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed by an interdisciplinary team. Results A total of 32 adults completed interviews. Participant ages ranged from 27 to 74 years. The majority (n=28, 88%) were female, occupied multiple TBD roles (eg, patient and parent), and had undergone genetic testing. Most engaged in web-based information-seeking (n=29, 91%) and TBD-specific social media (n=26, 81%). Participants found web-based resources useful for information-seeking but reported privacy concerns and frustration with forming supportive relationships. Most participants described ambivalence toward web-based resource use, citing tensions between hunger for information versus distrust, empowerment versus overwhelm, disclosure versus privacy, and accessibility versus connection. Fluctuations in web-based support use arose from perceived harms, information saturation, or decreased relevance over the course of TBD illness experience. Conclusions Individuals with TBDs and their caregivers reported frequent use of web-based informational and emotional support. However, ambivalence about the benefits and liabilities of web-based resources and persistent medical uncertainty may impact the adoption of and adherence to web-based support among patients with TBD and caregivers. Our findings suggest web-based psychosocial support should target long-term and multifaceted informational and emotional needs, be user-initiated, be offered alongside in-person formats, provide expert-informed information, and be attentive to personal privacy and evolving support needs of the TBD community. This study suggests web-based resources will be most effective in the TBD context when they achieve the following features: (1) offer a variety of ways to engage (eg, active and passive), (2) provide privacy protections in moderated “safe spaces” designed for personal disclosure, (3) offer separate venues for informational versus emotional support, (4) combine web-based relationship formation with opportunities for in-person gathering, (5) provide information that is reliable, easy to access, and informed by medical professionals, (6) remain mindful of user distress, and (7) are responsive to variations in levels and types of engagement. Additionally, advocacy organizations may wish to avoid traditional social media platforms when designing safe spaces for web-based emotional support, instead pivoting to internet-based tools that minimize privacy threats and limit the perpetual public availability of shared information.
BACKGROUND Background: Online information and social support are commonly used in rare disease communities where geographic dispersion and limited provider expertise complicate in-person support. We examined online resource use among caregivers of and individuals with telomere biology disorders (TBDs), which are rare genetic conditions with long diagnostic odysseys and uncertain prognoses including multi-organ system cancer risk. OBJECTIVE Objective: This study explored internet-based information-seeking and social support practices and perspectives of patients with TBDs and their caregivers. METHODS Methods: Our qualitative descriptive study used semi-structured interviews of patients with TBDs and caregivers. Data were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed by an interdisciplinary team. RESULTS Results: A total of 32 adults (median age = 49 years, range 27-74) completed interviews. Most engaged in online information-seeking (91%) and TBD-specific social media (81%). Participants found online resources useful for information-seeking but reported privacy concerns and frustration with forming supportive relationships. Most participants described ambivalence towards online resource use, citing tensions between hunger for information vs. distrust, empowerment vs. overwhelm, disclosure vs. privacy, and accessibility vs. connection. Fluctuations in virtual support use arose from perceived harms, information saturation, or decreased relevance over the course of TBD illness experience. CONCLUSIONS Conclusion: Individuals with TBDs and their caregivers reported frequent use of virtual informational and emotional support. However, some participants noted difficulty finding peers online and described discomfort with virtual emotional support, suggesting limitations to the value of online resources for meeting psychosocial needs in TBDs. Ambivalence about the benefits and liabilities of virtual resources and persistent medical uncertainty may impact the adoption of and adherence to online support among TBD patients and caregivers. Our findings suggest online psychosocial support should target long-term and multifaceted informational and emotional needs, be user-initiated, be offered alongside in-person formats, provide expert-informed information, and be attentive to personal privacy and evolving support needs of the TBD community.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.