Co-culture of rice and aquatic animals: An integrated system to achieve production and environmental sustainability

Bashir, Muhammad Amjad; Liu, Jian; Geng, Yucong; Wang, Hongyuan; Pan, Junting; Zhang, Dan; Rehim, Abdur; Aon, Muhammad; Liu, Hongbin

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119310

Cited by 93 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 78 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The area of rice–fish fields in China is 1.67 × 10 6 ha, which accounts for approximately 4.5% of the total rice planting area in China 7 . Many studies have demonstrated that rice–fish integrated farming is an economical and eco-friendly agricultural pattern alternative to rice monoculture 8 , 9 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Soil bacterial community composition in rice–fish integrated farming systems with different planting years

Zhao

Chu

Zhou

et al. 2021

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The high productivity and efficient nutrient utilization in rice–fish integrated farming system are well reported. However, the characteristics of soil bacterial communities and their relationship with soil nutrient availability in rice–fish field remain unclear. In this study, we selected three paddy fields, including a rice monoculture field and two rice–fish fields with different planting years, to investigate the soil bacterial community composition with Illumina MiSeq sequencing technology. The results indicated that the soil properties were significantly different among different rice farming systems. The soil bacterial community composition in the rice–fish field was significantly different from that in the rice monoculture field. Five of the top 15 phyla were observed with significant differences and Nitrospirae was the most significant one. However, no taxa observed with significance between the rice planting area and aquaculture area no matter in the 1st or 5th year of rice–fish field. RDA analysis showed that the soil bacterial community differentiation in the 5th year of rice–fish field was positively correlated with soil properties, such as AN and OM contents, EC and pH value. Although the rice yields in rice–fish field decreased, the net economic benefit of the rice–fish system enhanced obviously due to the high value of aquaculture animals.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Soil bacterial community composition in rice–fish integrated farming systems with different planting years

Zhao

Chu

Zhou

et al. 2021

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Local conditions could explain the contradictory results mentioned above regarding the comparative sustainability of RC systems. Bashir et al 19 . highlight that the adoption of rice‐fish systems may have been constrained recently by concern over drought‐related production risks because of the initial expansion of RC systems in high‐yielding cropland areas where the water table is typically deeper and RC systems are more likely to reduce yields 10 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The sustainability of rice‐crayfish coculture systems: a mini review of evidence from Jianghan plain in China

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND Rice‐crayfish coculture (RC) uses 10% of the paddy field area for crayfish ditches, with rice cultivated in the remaining area, providing staple carbohydrates alongside fish rich in protein and essential oils. These systems rely on complex interactions, involving nutrient cycling, fish feeding, soil physicochemical modification, and insect‐pest predation, and have important socio‐economic effects. Past studies have considered only one or a few of these aspects pertinent to food system sustainability, and there remains a need for an integrated assessment of RC systems. In this mini‐review, we collate data from two field experiments and three field surveys published across eight papers to synthesize the overall sustainability of RC systems in Jianghan Plain in China. RESULTS In deep groundwater fields, the RC rice yield was 30–55% lower than for typical rice‐rapeseed (RR) rotations, while CH4 emission and pesticide use were 41–96% and 50% lower, respectively. In shallow groundwater fields, RC rice yield was similar to typical rice monoculture (RM) cultivation, while CH4 emission and pesticide use were 28–41% and 17% lower for RC cultivation. Field survey data indicated that RC can improve soil nutrient and organic matter content significantly compared with RM cultivation, and also increase the diversity of fauna and flora in the paddy field whilst reducing the incidence of chilo suppressalis (a major rice pest). Feed inputs to RC systems increased crayfish yield by 31–71% and reduced the fraction of N inputs lost to the environment from 71% to 41%. CONCLUSION We conclude that RC systems with feed inputs in areas with shallow groundwater can deliver improved food security, sustainability, and resilience through ecological intensification. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry

show abstract

“…From these results be searched the dominant themes in minapadi. The guidelines were acquired from the studies literature for selection criteria [7], methodology and article structure [8,9].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In 1974-1979, rice fields that used the Minapadi method were decrease [18]. Then in the past few years, the technology of integrated fish and rice field has attracted farmers' attention again because it promises economic benefits [9,19]. This was also can find out on the increase yield of fish consumption, in 1955 around 0.1 tons per hectare [10], to 0.3-0.89 tons per hectare [17].…”

Section: History Of Minapadi Development In Indonesiamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Minapadi Trend, Need and Sustainability in Indonesia

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technology created to simplify human’s life. There amount of technology has been created. Current technology is the technology that used by humans from the past. Minapadi is technologies that has been created from the long time ago in agriculture and fisheries. Minapadi has existed in Indonesia since centuries ago. In past few years minapadi have become a trend in Indonesian article. This study literature conducted to study when minapadi become a trend and the urgency minapadi in Indonesia. Google scholar and Science Direct literature used in this literature study. This is to gather literature from Indonesian database, and for the comparison used literature from Science Direct. Minapadi used as keyword in Google Scholar, and in Science Direct used minapadi and "Rice Fish". In Indonesia there are an increase of minapadi article since 2016. It is dominated by economic study. Minapadi has the advantage of efficiency land for carbohydrate and protein production. Increase of number article minapadi shows an interest in minapadi. Meanwhile the growth of minapadi only increased by 48,083 hectares over 34 years. More research is needed to increase the use of minapadi, especially in the area adoption of technology, and environment for balancing the ecosystems.

show abstract

Co-culture of rice and aquatic animals: An integrated system to achieve production and environmental sustainability

Cited by 93 publications

References 78 publications

Soil bacterial community composition in rice–fish integrated farming systems with different planting years

Soil bacterial community composition in rice–fish integrated farming systems with different planting years

The sustainability of rice‐crayfish coculture systems: a mini review of evidence from Jianghan plain in China

Minapadi Trend, Need and Sustainability in Indonesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About