Co-designing a co-design tool to strengthen ideation in digital experience design at museums

Olesen, Anne Rørbæk; Holdgaard, Nanna; Løvlie, Anders Sundnes

doi:10.1080/15710882.2020.1812668

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The superiority of a solution is highly related to its context, i.e., the problem/challenge that is addressed. Most co-design tools are either ad hoc for one specific problem/ challenge [59,[63][64][65] or flexibly designed to address a series of challenges that can be classified under the same cluster [66][67][68]. Considering the exploration and experimental nature, developing an ad hoc gamification lacks flexibility.…”

Section: Define the Implementation Context And Objectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supporting a Sustainable and Engaging Online Transition for Co-Design through Gamification

Zhang

Patrício²,

Carella

et al. 2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Co-design approach is increasingly popular in many organizations that address global change and social sustainability challenges, thanks to its unique and diverse methods of engaging relevant people in design processes and decision-making. However, the social distancing led by the COVID-19 pandemic seriously problematized the traditional in-person co-design activities. A sustainable online transition is unprecedentedly pressing. By acknowledging the limitations of online co-design, i.e., lack of means for participant engagement, we argue that gamification holds great promise for online co-design. This paper presents an empirical study to investigate this potential qualitatively. Based on the data collected from three gamified online co-design implementations, we examine the benefits of gamification and how future activities should be designed and implemented from the participants’ perspectives. Based on the participants’ perceptions, we propose several recommendations for designing impactful gamification. The finding suggests that gamification can facilitate online co-design activities in an enjoyable, relaxing, structuring, and creative manner, since they are perceived and recognized by the participants. Moreover, the successful implementation of online co-design implies that great sustainability benefits can be achieved through online transition, i.e., reducing paper consumption and time spent on meetings and unproductive discussions, supporting extensive diversity and density in representation. Online can enable this by overcoming not only the geographic and time limitations but also relevant social issues.

show abstract

Section: Define the Implementation Context And Objectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Supporting a Sustainable and Engaging Online Transition for Co-Design through Gamification

Zhang

Patrício²,

Carella

et al. 2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Similarly, we designed a template for involving non-expert citizens and stakeholders in addressing the general and specific characteristics of the HNH framework. Designing tools to facilitate the transfer of relevant information for design knowledge is relevant both for designers [87] and for impacting the non-expert's mindsets [88], as is the case in citizen science processes [89,90]. We co-designed a template (Figure 4) within the research team to support the collective creativity that happens in collaborative-design-based processes [91][92][93].…”

Section: Templates Design For Collaborative Activitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Healthy and Inclusive Neighbourhoods: A Design Research Toolkit for the Promotion of Healthy Behaviours

Busciantella-Ricci,

Macchi,

Viviani

et al. 2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Addressing urban health through the built environment requires cross-disciplinary approaches, where design plays a crucial role. Gaining insights from a design-led research perspective to find situated solutions for promoting healthy behaviours is a requirement that must be clarified. Therefore, we ask the following question: what kind of design research instruments may help in applying the urban health approach from a design-led perspective? With this research question, and to contribute to the mentioned issues to be clarified, this paper presents the application of a framework adopted in a local action research project, namely the Healthy Neighbourhoods Hub (HNH) research project. The HNH framework was used as a design research toolkit for collecting contextual data and identifying insights to build scenarios and strategies for all the involved design disciplines. Around 169 participants among local stakeholders and citizens in two case studies in the city of Florence (Italy) were involved in semi-structured interviews, Healthy Labs, and Open Space Lab. As a result, the participatory activities provided a wide variety of qualitative data, such as themes related to user needs (n = 15), critical issues and points of weakness (n = 32), potentialities and points of strength (n = 27), strategies (n = 38), design insights (n = 30), and a collection of 40 local projects (40 in 5 themes), that contributed to the subsequent co-design activities of the project. This richness suggests the potential of using the adopted resources to build the HNH Toolkit as a design research instrument for addressing urban health and gaining design knowledge for the promotion of healthy behaviours through the design of the built environment.

show abstract

“…In museums, co‐design is an approach that has primarily been employed in the design of technologies in exhibits (e.g., Ciolfi et al., 2016; Fuks et al., 2012; Olesen et al., 2020). This approach has focused on the co‐creation that happens with a variety of stakeholders involved in developing exhibit pieces and signage (Avram et al., 2019).…”

Section: Co‐designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Making observations: Co‐design of an observation tool for and with maker educators

Wardrip,

White,

Bank

et al. 2024

Curator The Museum Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we share and reflect on the co‐development of an assessment tool for educators; an observation tool to identify evidence of learning and engagement in a museum and library makerspaces. Through a collaborative and iterative design process with educators, we co‐developed, revised, and refined an observation tool to be used by maker educators, researchers, and evaluators. Through this process, we evolved roles that leveraged the strengths and perspectives of both the researchers and educators involved. We also discuss implications for co‐design as an approach for professional learning of informal educators.

show abstract

Co-designing a co-design tool to strengthen ideation in digital experience design at museums

Cited by 10 publications

References 51 publications

Supporting a Sustainable and Engaging Online Transition for Co-Design through Gamification

Supporting a Sustainable and Engaging Online Transition for Co-Design through Gamification

Healthy and Inclusive Neighbourhoods: A Design Research Toolkit for the Promotion of Healthy Behaviours

Making observations: Co‐design of an observation tool for and with maker educators

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About