2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2020.102117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-digestion of municipal wastewater and microalgae biomass in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in the availability and activity of the microorganisms indicate that there is a higher probability that the same raw materials and techniques used to produce the WRW may not produce common species as the ones isolated in this study. [76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84]. The fermented WRW nutrient concentrations are generally within the range of the reported values obtained in the domestic and municipal wastewater and palm oil mill effluent (POME).…”
Section: Identification and Characterization Of The Bacterial Strainssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The differences in the availability and activity of the microorganisms indicate that there is a higher probability that the same raw materials and techniques used to produce the WRW may not produce common species as the ones isolated in this study. [76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84]. The fermented WRW nutrient concentrations are generally within the range of the reported values obtained in the domestic and municipal wastewater and palm oil mill effluent (POME).…”
Section: Identification and Characterization Of The Bacterial Strainssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The increased TKN removal could be associated with greater bioaccumulation of nitrogen in sludge, thereby resulting in more TKN removal efficiency as compared to other reported studies. Another study conducted in 2020 reported TKN removal of 64% utilizing an anaerobic sludge blanket reactor for municipal wastewater [ 28 ]. Anaerobic processes mainly convert organic nitrogen into ammonium nitrogen, but the remaining conversion of ammonium is not as efficient because of the lack of processes such as nitrification and denitrification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many studies reported that ACoD of SS and microalgae reduces the process performance and efficiency [175,177,180]. According to Goncalves et al [181] and Olsson et al [182], adding 20 w/w% and 40 w/w% microalgae as co-substrate decreased specific methane production by 5% and 26% compared to SS mono-digestion. Generally, data given in Table 7 reveals that the specific values of methane production from co-digestion of SS and microalgae can be up to 111% less than that of SS mono-digestion.…”
Section: Overall Process Performancementioning
confidence: 99%