2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-ensiling of straw with sugar beet leaves increases the methane yield from straw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the results show that in some cases it is very difficult to obtain a reliable quantitative estimation of BMP preservation from COD losses by H2 and CH4 production. For certain conditions, this should be due to the fact that during ensiling some gains in bioavailability may occur (due to further hydrolysis of the inaccessible fractions [3,16,18]), which has not been integrated into the model. In addition, when the ensiling is very inefficient, namely for CM-Fresh, the preservation of the BMP is overestimated by the simulations.…”
Section: Bmp Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the results show that in some cases it is very difficult to obtain a reliable quantitative estimation of BMP preservation from COD losses by H2 and CH4 production. For certain conditions, this should be due to the fact that during ensiling some gains in bioavailability may occur (due to further hydrolysis of the inaccessible fractions [3,16,18]), which has not been integrated into the model. In addition, when the ensiling is very inefficient, namely for CM-Fresh, the preservation of the BMP is overestimated by the simulations.…”
Section: Bmp Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These chemical pathways are illustrated in Table 1. Ensiling is particularly interesting for AD as it can lead to full preservation of the biomethane potential (BMP) of feedstocks for prolonged durations (that can reach up to 1 year) [2,7,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. However, ensiling performance is extremely dependent on the feedstock and its biochemical properties, notably the total solids (TS) level, the amount of accessible carbohydrates, the buffering capacity and the nature of the initial endogenous microflora [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods include physical methods such as milling [10], microwave [11], extrusion [12] or ultrasonication [13]; chemical methods such as alkaline or acid hydrolysis [14,15]; physiochemical methods such as steam explosion [16] or liquid hot water [17]; and biological methods with enzymatic pre-treatment [18] among others. In spite of being able to increase the biodegradability and methane (CH 4 ) yield from lignocellulosic biomasses, the majority of the lab-scale pre-treatments are technically challenged if upscaled and are unfavorable regarding the cost of additives and their energy consumption [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dextranicum strains and Lactobacillus strains, which would promote the lactic acid fermentation during co-ensiling [30]. As a result of this, the organic acids will break down the waxy hydrophobic surface of straw and function as acid catalysts to disrupt the ester bonds in the biopolymers [19]. The high DM content in straw will minimize the risk of effluent loss from the sugar beet roots, as straw can absorb excess liquid, and may prevent the clostridial growth, which is typically inhibited at DM contents above 30% [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the technologies of alternative use of sugar beet for biogas, in European countries, as well as in Poland, significant technical progress is noted, especially in the field of storage and preparation of substrates for biogas plants [25,26,27,28]. The substrate must be available throughout the all year while the harvest is carried out seasonally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%