2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-existence of seals and fisheries? Adaptation of a coastal fishery for recovery of the Baltic grey seal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like the monk seal, the sea otter conflicted primarily with fishers, and significant disparities existed among stakeholder groups in their values and perceptions of the species (Cicin-Sain et al 1982, Palumbi & Sotka 2010. Similar situations are occurring currently with pinnipeds in New Zealand (Childerhouse & Gales 1998) and mammals in the Arctic (Lovecraft & Meek 2011, Varjopuro 2011.…”
Section: Historical Rarity Shifting Baselines and Species Recoverysupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Like the monk seal, the sea otter conflicted primarily with fishers, and significant disparities existed among stakeholder groups in their values and perceptions of the species (Cicin-Sain et al 1982, Palumbi & Sotka 2010. Similar situations are occurring currently with pinnipeds in New Zealand (Childerhouse & Gales 1998) and mammals in the Arctic (Lovecraft & Meek 2011, Varjopuro 2011.…”
Section: Historical Rarity Shifting Baselines and Species Recoverysupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The possibility that seals may adversely affect salmonid populations by predation has led to demands for control of seal populations (Carter et al, 2001;Yodzis, 2001;Stenman, 2007;Graham et al, 2011). It is a complicated and controversial issue (Varjopuro, 2011), and any discussion of this issue has been constrained by a lack of data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents claimed that compensation, even if modest, would go a long way toward supporting their livelihoods and indicate government support for local fisheries. Conservation-related compensation is known to strengthen the economic viability of small-scale fishermen (Varjopuro, 2011), and to provide economic help to people who interact with protected species (Wagner et al, 1997;Nyhus et al, 2005).…”
Section: Compensation As a Mitigation Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fishermen's opinions and attitudes have been explored for species that include Dalmatian pelicans, Pelecanus crispus, and other wetland birds in Prespa, Kerkini, and Vistonis lakes in Greece (Pyrovetsi and Daoutopoulos, 1989), Mediterranean monk seals in Greece (Glain et al, 2001), gray seals, Halichoerus grypus, in Cornwall, UK (Glain et al, 2001), and in the Baltic sea (Varjopuro, 2011), whales, dolphins, and porpoises in the Mediterranean (Fratzis, 2007) and otters, Lutra lutra, in Czech Republic aquatic ecosystems (Vaclavicova et al, 2010). In these studies, fishermen are reported as having negative attitudes and opinions toward these species because they are perceived to be responsible for damages caused to fishing gear and/or as competitors to their fishery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%