“…This is a marked difference to the Cu,Zn case, but beyond that the similarities are obvious: in both cases, Cu,Mg at 103 °C and Cu,Zn at 65 °C, the rapid crystallization occurs after the same 60–65 min, and identical IR bands are found after 120–180 min of total aging time. As we have previously seen that the Cu,Mg crystallization kinetics at 65 °C are extremely slow compared to Cu,Zn, the observed similarity can be attributed to the accelerating effect of the increased aging temperature. The findings from in situ IR indicate that, on a time scale, the hydrothermal aging brings Cu,Mg crystallization closer to the Cu,Zn aging, which therefore opens a path to Cu,Mg hydroxycarbonates with similar Cu/ M +II ratios, as already known for Cu,Zn.…”