Co-innovation: a review and conceptual framework

Saragih, Harriman Samuel; Tan, Jacob Donald

doi:10.1504/ijbir.2018.095542

Cited by 33 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on analyzing several definitions of "ecosystem", Sotarauta, Heinonen, Sorvisto, and Kolehmainen [38] suggested several key features of the innovation ecosystem, including "interconnectedness" (everything is connected to everything), "organic nature" (the system evolves through its components' continuous adaptation to changing situations) and being "multi-locational" (knowledge flows and innovation processes take place in multiple geographical locations) (pp. [31][32]. All these infer that complex interactions amongst a variety of (transnational and cross-sectoral) actors shape adaptation processes in an innovation ecosystem.…”

Section: Transnational Innovation Ecosystemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In such networks, new ideas and approaches from various internal and external sources are integrated in a platform to generate shared values [31]. The core elements of co-innovation include "collaboration, coordination, co-creation, convergence, and complementary" [32] (p. 361). Figure 2 demonstrates that two industrial firms that are unfamiliar with each other, respectively from Country A and Country B, could be connected for potential collaboration by utilizing their common connections to existing university collaborations (especially individual collaborators) between the two countries.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In such networks, new ideas and approaches from various internal and external sources are integrated in a platform to generate shared values [31]. The core elements of co-innovation include "collaboration, coordination, co-creation, convergence, and complementary" [32] (p. 361). The transnational industry cooperation (TIC) and transnational university cooperation (TUC) synergetic entities (or transnational U-I co-innovation networks) to be tackled in our research.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Building University-Industry Co-Innovation Networks in Transnational Innovation Ecosystems: Towards a Transdisciplinary Approach of Integrating Social Sciences and Artificial Intelligence

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a potential solution to fill a gap in both research and practice that there are few interactions between transnational industry cooperation (TIC) and transnational university cooperation (TUC) in transnational innovation ecosystems. To strengthen the synergies between TIC and TUC for innovation, the first step is to match suitable industrial firms from two countries for collaboration through their common connections to transnational university/academic partnerships. Our proposed matching solution is based on the integration of social science theories and specific artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. While the insights of social sciences, e.g., innovation studies and social network theory, have potential to answer the question of why TIC and TUC should be looked at as synergetic entities with elaborated conceptualization, the method of machine learning, as one specific technic off AI, can help answer the question of how to realize that synergy. On the way towards a transdisciplinary approach to TIC and TUC synergy building, or creating transnational university-industry co-innovation networks, the paper takes an initial step by examining what the supports and gaps of existing studies on the topic are, and using the context of EU–China science, technology and innovation cooperation as a testbed. This is followed by the introduction of our proposed approach and our suggestions for future research.

show abstract

Section: Transnational Innovation Ecosystemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In such networks, new ideas and approaches from various internal and external sources are integrated in a platform to generate shared values [31]. The core elements of co-innovation include "collaboration, coordination, co-creation, convergence, and complementary" [32] (p. 361). The transnational industry cooperation (TIC) and transnational university cooperation (TUC) synergetic entities (or transnational U-I co-innovation networks) to be tackled in our research.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Building University-Industry Co-Innovation Networks in Transnational Innovation Ecosystems: Towards a Transdisciplinary Approach of Integrating Social Sciences and Artificial Intelligence

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…More recently, Zaborek and Mazur (2017) recalled the well-established DART model (Prahalad and Ramaswamy, 2004) and combined it with innovation, simultaneously recalling V&L04 to describe the essential features of service offerings in SDL and to establish the theoretical elements of their research. Finally, Saragih and Tan (2018) reviewed the literature on co-innovation and proposed a conceptual framework to describe the key elements of the debate on innovation, open innovation, and co-innovation. Therefore, more research in this topic is expected.…”

Section: Category 3 -Positionmentioning

confidence: 99%

15 years of service-dominant logic: analyzing citation practices of Vargo and Lusch (2004)

Tregua

Brozović

D’Auria

2021

JSTP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this article was to provide an outline of the citation practices of “Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing” by Vargo and Lusch (2004) to identify and discuss the most prominent research topics in which citations were used and to suggest future research based on the results of the analysis.Design/methodology/approachThe authors used a comprehensive framework of citation practices based on iterations of previous literature to analyze the relevant literature, which they identified by accessing, systematically and rigorously, every available contribution matching a set of criteria. The authors then categorized these contributions and highlighted the main topics of research interest in each category.FindingsThe findings identify some of the factors in the continuous development of SDL, the way this new marketing logic permeated the scientific debate, the infusion of Vargo and Lusch (2004) into several contributions framed in the new logic or justified through it, and a general perception of a default reference. Additionally, the findings highlight the main topics of research interest in each category.Research limitations/implicationsThe analysis enabled the detection of the original paper's influence through advances in service studies, pollination into other fields of research and continuous scientific debate. The authors have highlighted several avenues for research and proposed future research directions.Originality/valueThis research analyzed the effects of the spread of the SDL cornerstone article and emphasized the advantage of using an in-depth approach to the analysis of studies through a framework applied to more than 4,600 studies.

show abstract

“…A business ecosystem is related to the creation of customer value, a knowledge ecosystem is related to the creation of knowledge and technology, while an innovation ecosystem combines the research concept of the knowledge ecosystem and the production concept of the business ecosystem and focuses on the joint value creation [10,15]. An innovation ecosystem or "co-innovation network" emerges as an integrating ecosystem between generating new knowledge and using it to create value in business ecosystems [5,[16][17][18].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Formation of educational ecosystems through the digital transformation of the educational environment

Gerashchenko

Kovalev

2021

SHS Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cognitive and digital transformation stimulates both academic and applied interest in the concept of socio-economic ecosystems. Today, traditional interaction chains in education, cooperation forms, for example, network ones, should give way to new organizational-economic interaction mechanisms – educational ecosystems. Research purpose is development of theoretical approaches to the formation of cross-geographic educational ecosystems through the digital transformation of the educational environment. The study is based on general scientific methods of systematization, comparison and generalization of research in the field of formation and functioning of ecosystems. Structural-functional and integrated approaches were used to develop the concept of formation of educational ecosystems. A comparative analysis of three overlapping ecosystem concepts (business ecosystems, knowledge ecosystems and innovation ecosystems) was carried out. The type, approaches and strategies for the formation of cross-geographic educational ecosystems have been determined. It is noted that digital transformation forms a digital educational environment, which can serve as the basis for the formation of cross-geographic educational ecosystems. As a typical basis for the formation of an educational ecosystem, it is proposed to use a business ecosystem as a form of socio-economic interaction of actors. As a strategy for the formation of an ecosystem, a structural strategy is defined with the allocation of a core – a leading university or an association of universities, and as actors – universities, students, post-graduate students, teachers, employees, graduating students, employers and other stakeholders. It is noted that the core plays a key role in the formation of a cross-geographic educational ecosystem. An effective strategy of the educational business ecosystem depends on the ability of the core to place other participants in positions and endow them with roles, on the one hand, corresponding to the strategy of the ecosystem as a whole, on the other hand, ensuring the actors’ satisfaction.

show abstract

Co-innovation: a review and conceptual framework

Cited by 33 publications

References 0 publications

Building University-Industry Co-Innovation Networks in Transnational Innovation Ecosystems: Towards a Transdisciplinary Approach of Integrating Social Sciences and Artificial Intelligence

Building University-Industry Co-Innovation Networks in Transnational Innovation Ecosystems: Towards a Transdisciplinary Approach of Integrating Social Sciences and Artificial Intelligence

15 years of service-dominant logic: analyzing citation practices of Vargo and Lusch (2004)

Formation of educational ecosystems through the digital transformation of the educational environment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About