Co‐innovation behavior and sustainable innovation in competitive environments

Adomako, Samuel; Nguyen, Nguyen Phong

doi:10.1002/sd.2479

Cited by 13 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 94 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Over time, the concept of OI has been validated, modified, and expanded upon, leading to the development of other ways of exploiting external sources of innovation (West & Bogers, 2014). Co-innovation has emerged as a hot spot in the field of innovation, as a new paradigm in the OI evolutionary literature and in the value creation process (Adomako & Nguyen, 2023;Zhou et al, 2023). In Co-innovation new ideas and perspectives from various sources are integrated into a platform to generate new organizational and shared value (Lee et al, 2012).…”

Section: Beyond Open Innovation: Scientific Mapping and The Synthesis...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond Open Innovation: scientific mapping and the synthesis of the Co-innovation process as a new paradigm

Silva,

Vieira,

Grützmann

et al. 2024

Int. J. Innov.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Mapping the theoretical framework of publications on Open Innovation (OI) and Co-innovation regarding the concept of value and synthesizing the literature on Co-innovation, seeking the flow of contributions and proposing a research agenda. Design/Methodology/Approach: A bibliometric analysis and integrative review was carried out through articles, reviews and conference articles published in international databases according to Prado et al. (2016) and Torraco (2016). Originality: Studies have revisited, refined and criticized OI over the years, whose theoretical field has advanced and debated the emergence of new concepts, such as Co-innovation. However, the discussion about how this new paradigm emerges and dialogues with OI and can be considered an evolutionary theme is still lacking in the literature. Results: Although publications and temporal trends on Co-innovation have shown to be promising, the highlighted authors did not present temporal extension of their productions and the field is still in constant oscillations. Despite the streams of contributions with important scope in the construction of the paradigm, the theme still needs epistemological discussions for theoretical consolidation. Theoretical and methodological contributions: This study contributes to epistemological advances on OI and stimulates reflection for discussions and development of contemporary approaches to innovation. Management contributions: This research presents dimensions and stages of Co-innovation processes with elements that impact its practice. Furthermore, it sheds light on the importance of selecting partners (identifying different actors and their roles in the co-creation process) and establishing adequate mechanisms to encourage client participation.

show abstract

Section: Beyond Open Innovation: Scientific Mapping and The Synthesis...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond Open Innovation: scientific mapping and the synthesis of the Co-innovation process as a new paradigm

Silva,

Vieira,

Grützmann

et al. 2024

Int. J. Innov.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As a result, scholars are beginning to pay more attention to the factors that influence sustainable innovation. For example, some researchers stated that co‐innovation behaviors positively influence sustainable innovation (Adomako & Nguyen, 2022). Others found that radical, systematic marketing innovation and multi‐stakeholder collaboration are key drivers of sustainable innovation (Kwak et al, 2023).…”

Section: Review Literature and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

How does digital transformation affect sustainable innovation performance? The pivotal roles of digital technology‐business alignment and environmental uncertainty

Lin,

Mao

2023

Sustainable Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite the importance of digital transformation in improving sustainable innovation performance, the mechanisms and boundary conditions through which digital transformation affects sustainable innovation performance is unclear. Using the lens of information technology‐enabled organizational capabilities, this study develops a moderated mediation model based on new economic growth theory and information asymmetry theory to examine the impact of digital transformation on sustainable innovation performance. Using a sample of Chinese agriculture firms, our findings reveal that digital transformation positively affects sustainable innovation performance through digital technology‐business alignment, and this indirect effect is stronger when environmental uncertainty is lower. Moreover, environmental uncertainty negatively moderates the relationship between digital transformation and digital technology‐business alignment. Our theoretical explanations and empirical evidence provide insights into how digital transformation initiatives can be leveraged to improve sustainable innovation performance, thus making an important contribution to the related literature.

show abstract

“…The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), also known as the Global Goals, are a set of 17 interconnected goals established by the United Nations to address global challenges and achieve a more sustainable future (Adomako & Nguyen, 2022; United Nations, 2023). These goals encompass various areas, including poverty eradication, quality education, gender equality, clean energy, responsible consumption and production, and climate action.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The future of baby cosmetics packaging and sustainable development: A look at sustainable materials and packaging innovations – A systematic review

Vrabič‐Brodnjak,

Jestratijević

2023

Sustainable Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Packaging waste's ecological impact, stemming from resource depletion, plastic pollution, and climate concerns, is prompting environmental worries. Within the baby cosmetics domain, management task involves balancing safety, hygiene standards, consumer preferences, and regulations, all while adopting eco‐friendly packaging. This study presents a holistic global assessment of sustainable packaging options tailored for the baby cosmetics sector. By employing a systematic methodology encompassing planning using Python programming, data evaluation, analysis, and synthesis, the investigation scrutinized packaging claims from 2048 brands, including 76 specializing in baby cosmetics. Findings reveal that while 39% of brands omit packaging material details, 61% embrace recyclable, refillable, or bio‐based alternatives. This shift underscores a growing sustainability inclination, though undisclosed packaging materials indicate transparency gaps, urging enhanced regulations. Remarkably, only 14 baby cosmetic brands among those studied incorporate diverse certifications and standards. This study's novelty lies in its exhaustive analysis of sustainable packaging solutions tailored for the baby cosmetics sector. It highlights the pressing need for cosmetic companies to adopt sustainable packaging, ensure transparency, and collaborate industry‐wide to ensure a sustainable future for baby cosmetic packaging.

show abstract

Co‐innovation behavior and sustainable innovation in competitive environments

Cited by 13 publications

References 94 publications

Beyond Open Innovation: scientific mapping and the synthesis of the Co-innovation process as a new paradigm

Beyond Open Innovation: scientific mapping and the synthesis of the Co-innovation process as a new paradigm

How does digital transformation affect sustainable innovation performance? The pivotal roles of digital technology‐business alignment and environmental uncertainty

The future of baby cosmetics packaging and sustainable development: A look at sustainable materials and packaging innovations – A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About