2007
DOI: 10.4265/bio.12.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-inoculation of an Antibiotic-Producing Bacterium and a Lytic Enzyme-Producing Bacterium for the Biocontrol of Tomato Wilt Caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the presence of these crude preparations and prodigiosin from S. marcescens CAB 1094, we observed a significant decrease in the numbers of culturable yeast cells. These results support the findings of others who discovered that a number of fungi, including Didymella applanata [62], Fusarium oxysporum [65], Trichoderma reesei and Phycomyces blakesleeanus [56], are relatively resistant in vitro to the effect of S. marcescens chitinases. However, studies indicate that the co-inoculation of S. marcescens and Pseudomonas fluorescens enhances the antifungal activity of P. fluorescens towards F. oxysporum [65], and it was contented that this enhanced antifungal effect was a result of S. marcescens chitinase activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the presence of these crude preparations and prodigiosin from S. marcescens CAB 1094, we observed a significant decrease in the numbers of culturable yeast cells. These results support the findings of others who discovered that a number of fungi, including Didymella applanata [62], Fusarium oxysporum [65], Trichoderma reesei and Phycomyces blakesleeanus [56], are relatively resistant in vitro to the effect of S. marcescens chitinases. However, studies indicate that the co-inoculation of S. marcescens and Pseudomonas fluorescens enhances the antifungal activity of P. fluorescens towards F. oxysporum [65], and it was contented that this enhanced antifungal effect was a result of S. marcescens chitinase activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results support the findings of others who discovered that a number of fungi, including Didymella applanata [62], Fusarium oxysporum [65], Trichoderma reesei and Phycomyces blakesleeanus [56], are relatively resistant in vitro to the effect of S. marcescens chitinases. However, studies indicate that the co-inoculation of S. marcescens and Pseudomonas fluorescens enhances the antifungal activity of P. fluorescens towards F. oxysporum [65], and it was contented that this enhanced antifungal effect was a result of S. marcescens chitinase activity. Similarly, researchers found that culture filtrates from S. marcescens show synergistic antifungal activity with a number of chemical fungicides against sclerotial viability of Rhizoctonia solani [64].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…24 isolates were positive for lipase, 19 each for protease and xylanase, 14 for amylase, 11 for pectinase, and 9 for cellulase ( Figure 1(b)). Production of extracellular cell wall degrading enzymes has been associated with biocontrol abilities in plant growth promoting microbes [13,37]. The influence due to the presence of plant growth promoting microbes was demonstrable when the soil was used in form of inoculum representing a "consortium" of beneficial microbes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These enzymes were also identified at high levels in the laticifer cells of rubber tree 101 . Microbial chitinases have been shown to exhibit antifungal activity and used for biological control against plant fungal diseases 102–105 . Chitinases of insect origin also exhibit toxic effects on other insects upon oral ingestion 106, 107 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%