2012
DOI: 10.7768/1948-5123.1127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-instructing on extended wilderness expeditions: A phenomenological inquiry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shooter, Sibthorp, & Paisley, 2009). Recently, Vernon and Seaman (2012) studied this specifically; their work illustrates the complexity of the co-instructor relationship, which has both personal and professional aspects. Vernon and Seaman astutely acknowledge the instructor team relationship as an integral part of the social system that actively influences that course's social structure and environment.…”
Section: Instructor Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shooter, Sibthorp, & Paisley, 2009). Recently, Vernon and Seaman (2012) studied this specifically; their work illustrates the complexity of the co-instructor relationship, which has both personal and professional aspects. Vernon and Seaman astutely acknowledge the instructor team relationship as an integral part of the social system that actively influences that course's social structure and environment.…”
Section: Instructor Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, the hierarchical nature of classroom learning is deconstructed and creates increased opportunities for collaborative experiences (Morrison & Chorba, 2015). While the literature notes one example of the negative influence of staff on overall student experience due to setting unrealistic expectations (McKenzie & University, 2003), several examples exist for the positive influence of staff on the social connection and relationship development aspect of this type of educational programming (Shooter et al, 2009, 2010, 2012; Vernon & Seaman, 2012). Our study participants consistently reported these positive influences and appreciated staff treating them with dignity and respect, being personable and relatable, and behaving differently than if they were in a classroom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%