Co‐Movement of Political Risk and Sovereign Credit Risk: A Wavelet Coherence Analysis for Argentina, Brazil, and Venezuela

Abstract

Objective. This article aim to investigate the causal relationship between sovereign credit risk and political risk in Argentina, Brazil, and Venezuela. Methods. Granger causality, Toda Yamamoto causality, and wavelet coherence tests are used to answer the following questions: (i) Is there are causal linkage between sovereign credit risk and political risk? (ii) If yes, in which direction(s)? It also provides a recent literature on the methods of quantification of political risk and historic economic instabilities in the selected countries. Results. The findings from wavelet coherence reveal that (i) between 1997 and 2005, sovereign credit risk significantly causes political risk in Argentina at medium frequency but between 2008 and 2015, at high frequency, the direction of causality is opposite relative to the previous period; (ii) the correlation between political risk and sovereign credit risk is not high throughout the period of 1993-2015, although there is a positive correlation between sovereign credit risk and political risk 1998 and 2000 at only high frequency in Brazil; (iii) between 1997 and 2011, political risk significantly causes sovereign credit risk in Venezuela. At high frequency, between 2006 and 2007, there is also positive correlation between sovereign credit risk and political risk. Conclusion. There is evidence that there is a feedback causal relationship between political risk and sovereign credit risk at different frequencies.

Analysis of Wavelet Coherence: Service Sector Index and Economic Growth in an Emerging Market

“…When R 2 (k,f ) approaches 1, it shows that the time series variables are correlated with a certain scale, which are shown in the figures below in red color and surrounded by a black line. Furthermore, if R 2 (k,f ) reaches 0, it means that there is no correlation between the time series variables and is shown in blue color [48].…”

Ongoing Debate Between Foreign Aid and Economic Growth in Nigeria: A Wavelet Analysis

“…(3) The variables are out of phase when the arrows are pointed to the left (negatively related). (4) The factors are out of phase whenever the arrows point to the left (negative relationship) (Kirikkaleli and Ozun, 2019). Based on the interpretation of Kirikkaleli and Gokmenoglu (2019) on wavelet coherence techniques, (1) whenever the first variable causes the second variable, the arrows will point right-down or left-up, whereas when the second variable causes the first variable, the arrows point right-up or left-down; (2) the parameters have a cyclical impact in phase and an anti-cyclical impact in phase or phase out; and (3) the X-axis refers to the period of analysis, while the Y-axis refers to the frequency.…”

Time and Frequency Dependency of Foreign Exchange Rates and Country Risk: Evidence From Turkey

“…Gökmenoğlu et al (2019) examine the nexus between economic risk and foreign direct investment. Kirikkaleli and Özün (2019) examine the nexus between political risk and sovereign credit risk. Kirikkaleli (2020a) examines the effect of economic, financial, and political risk on the stock market in Taiwan.…”