2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-occurrence of high-frequency oscillations and delayed responses evoked by intracranial electrical stimulation in stereo-EEG studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Epileptic cortex has been identified using delayed responses (DRs), which occur between 0.1 and 1s after stimulation, when using a stimulation frequency of 0.1 Hz. A correlation was also found between DRs and HFOs . HFOs have also been detected using 0.2 Hz stimulation and correlated with the EZ .…”
Section: Physical Stimulation Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Epileptic cortex has been identified using delayed responses (DRs), which occur between 0.1 and 1s after stimulation, when using a stimulation frequency of 0.1 Hz. A correlation was also found between DRs and HFOs . HFOs have also been detected using 0.2 Hz stimulation and correlated with the EZ .…”
Section: Physical Stimulation Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Furthermore, CCEP stimulation has novel applications to reveal potential biomarkers of epileptogenicity, specifically high‐frequency oscillations (HFOs),during stimulation of epileptic tissue. To define the epileptogenic zone, several studies have also employed this technique (Tables and ). Although there are numerous uses for CCEPs, the precise methodology remains relatively undocumented, largely because of center‐specific customized techniques in both performing and analyzing CCEP responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 The slow early components of CCEPs, which are only considered here, are thought to be less affected by the pathology than the late ones, even for stimulating or recording electrode contacts located in either the epileptogenic or the propagation zone. 20,21 However, to minimize a potential bias in our findings due to epileptogenic processes, we removed from our analysis the data recorded by electrode contacts suspected to present a pathological activity. To do so in an unsupervised manner, we computed the interictal spiking rate of each contact from prestimulation period recordings using Delphos software (Detector of Electro Physiological Oscillations and Spikes) 22,23 .…”
Section: Processing and Selection Of Ccepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High frequency activity during the CCEP (32,33) or suppression of high-frequency activity after stimulation (34) have been investigated for their SOZ localizing power. Specifically high frequency oscillations were found to colocalize with CCEP responses (35)(36)(37), in one study as much as 40% of the time (38). Lastly, graph theoretical properties of the networks generated from CCEP response amplitudes revealed that networks are more bi-directionally connected in the SOZ than in non-SOZ regions (39)(40)(41).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%